Uh oh, retard alert. EDIT: Okay, in response to all the dislikes, I must have misinterpreted the original comment. I thought that the original comment is saying that america has more crime rate because it has more people to commit crime, to which I responded retard alert because crime rate is measured in percentage, but obviously this isn't the case. Would someone care to explain what he really meant and so I can amend my mistake?
Perhaps they just disagree with you, I mean we have three times the population of both of the countries mentioned, why shouldn't that be a cause for crime?
It's true. You can leave a gun in a case or on the floor and it won't hurt anyone on it's own. SOMEBODY has to pick it up – and the result is either it's fine, that was almost deadly, it was an accident, or arrest that person.
NO BUT THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS LAW AND IS FINAL AND MUST NEVER BE CHANGED BECAUSE IT IS THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND IT IS 222 YEARS OLD AND SO IT CANT BE CHANGED BECAUSE IT IS THE 2ND AMENDMENT.
Alright that's true, and ps our bill or rights and constitution has parts of the Magna Carta the constitution is there to protect the majority of the people, if the majority of states want a amendment to be changed it can be changed I'm arguing at the fact that people don't see people kill people, it doesn't matter if it's with guns take the children's crusade as an example.
Comments