This is a old cliche, which breaks down when you find out the Pro Life/Anti Abortion movement has as many women in it as men (if not more women then men)
Cool, but that doesn't mean you take away freedom of choice from one and a half million people, especially given that circumstances are unique. Plus, not one man should be in the Pro-Life movement since, really, they have no idea what it's like to be pregnant or give birth; past conception, the male has basically zero non-legal obligation to the woman or child, and legal obligations can and are avoided. (This is coming from a man, by the way.)
If you recognize that abortion ends a life, it's hard to make the argument that it's only a woman's choice. For example, you wouldn't say that I shouldn't have an opinion on a man beating his girlfriend or wife because I've never beat a woman. Or that you or I can't have a valid opinion on murder because we've never committed murder (making an assumption about you, of course).
Saying that a man has no legal consequences for an unwanted child is both wrong and facetious. Factious because men are saddled with responsibility, and wrong because "I can't make someone else pay for someone so we may as well kill that someone" is a pretty bad philosophy.
I...don't even know where you're going with this and I'm not sure whether to agree or disagree. So tell me, what would happen "if women kept their legs closed"? Why does it look like you're assuming all women always keep their legs open? What do you mean by this?
Comments
Saying that a man has no legal consequences for an unwanted child is both wrong and facetious. Factious because men are saddled with responsibility, and wrong because "I can't make someone else pay for someone so we may as well kill that someone" is a pretty bad philosophy.
Take the picnic basket out of your ass and enjoy life a little.