Now tell me the percentage of humanity that is still living and hunting in its natural habitat. There are enough predators that eat weak prey, the world doesn't need us.
▼
·
Edited 6 years ago
deleted
· 6 years ago
Don't come here with that "humanity is a disease" bullshit. All other sapient species that may or may not be out there have likely been or are currently in our current position. And single species have caused global warming and global mass extinctions before, mainly stromatolites.
Pandas are supposed to be extinct
They can't even reproduce in their perfect, natural habitat
They don't adjust themselves to survive
Their extinction is meant to be
.
Human is the top of the good chain
We are one of the most developed species with great flexibility and adjustments that have kept us survive and thrive for millions years
Don't compare us to such an useless creature such as pandas
Actually, pandas have been around about 500,000 years longer than us.... and if we don't get our shit together, we could easily go out a lot sooner than 500,000 years... meaning the pandas would technically be more successful, evolutionary speaking.
They can't even reproduce in their perfect, natural habitat
They don't adjust themselves to survive
Their extinction is meant to be
.
Human is the top of the good chain
We are one of the most developed species with great flexibility and adjustments that have kept us survive and thrive for millions years
Don't compare us to such an useless creature such as pandas
They have been around longer but they suck