No, only the ones where anyone can claim anything and have it accepted as indisputable fact.
I don't give a damn about net neutrality either way, but you cannot use bullshit circle-jerk Twitter pages as a point in your favor.
Oh I'm not using it as a point, I'm just saying you should check it out once you get your head far enough out of trumps ass :)
Also-- you really should care about net neutrality?? Just because your dudes in the wrong here doesn't make it something to ignore
One more thing, an indisputable fact is that trump did appoint him. Get over it
I'm not disputing that Trump put him charge, I simply have faith in the market. Worst case scenario, I'll get to stop paying for the crap I don't use.
If you have any desire for an actual discussion, you should refrain from the insults.
I might respond again when you can learn some civility.
Your decisive rhetoric will only serve to widen the divide between people.
Your Fedora is showing.
Worst case scenario- you end up having to buy all the bundles because of how each site is separated and pay more than you already do. You still have to buy the initial internet service, but you have to buy internet bundles of websites to actually use those websites. Do you not grasp what exactly is at stake if neutrality is taken?
One more thing, you decided to talk in the place of sero. From what I've seen, you have no idea how the economy or government works. I didn't ask you to talk, nor did I force you, so leave if you've run out of ways to back up trump.
▼
·
Edited 6 years ago
deleted
· 6 years ago
Really didn't listen to the "refrain from insults" thing, did you?
1
deleted
· 6 years ago
I asked for a source from a place like just facts or a direct tweet, but damn. Didn't know such a good and good for you cereal was such an inflammatory square of hate for our pres.
http://www.latimes.com/business/lazarus/la-fi-lazarus-fcc-net-neutrality-20171124-story.html
https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/23/14338522/fcc-chairman-ajit-pai-donald-trump-appointment
There's one
http://fortune.com/2017/11/21/fcc-net-neutrality/
That's two
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/29/534828696/trump-picks-republican-lawyer-for-fcc-commissioner-seat
Bam there's a third. Good now?
https://mobile.twitter.com/trump_regrets?lang=en
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-fcc-idUSKBN1572RK
I don't give a damn about net neutrality either way, but you cannot use bullshit circle-jerk Twitter pages as a point in your favor.
Also-- you really should care about net neutrality?? Just because your dudes in the wrong here doesn't make it something to ignore
One more thing, an indisputable fact is that trump did appoint him. Get over it
If you have any desire for an actual discussion, you should refrain from the insults.
I might respond again when you can learn some civility.
Your decisive rhetoric will only serve to widen the divide between people.
Worst case scenario- you end up having to buy all the bundles because of how each site is separated and pay more than you already do. You still have to buy the initial internet service, but you have to buy internet bundles of websites to actually use those websites. Do you not grasp what exactly is at stake if neutrality is taken?
One more thing, you decided to talk in the place of sero. From what I've seen, you have no idea how the economy or government works. I didn't ask you to talk, nor did I force you, so leave if you've run out of ways to back up trump.