I'm going to respectfully disagree here for a few reasons.
A) Science says it is more about facial symmetry than specific features
B) More feminine features on a man/more masculine features on a woman give an androgynous look, when looked at in an unbiased scenario they are more likely to gain interest from a broader spectrum of people
C) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder yadayadayada
He's about 20 years older than her, she was a baby or not born yet when that picture of him was taken, and he was likely dating or marrying his current wife when hers was taken. 20 years difference in age can really change how we view someone's looks. I'll glance over the differences in standard of beauty for men and women as well as the roles and marketing each has had to be more brief. Looking at most celebrities with no or minimal make up and styling, they likely aren't any more or less attractive than people you know or see everyday. We are constantly exposed to celebrities and told what to think of them. The world has spent decades being told in print, film, by awards and more how beautiful Angelina Jolee is, no one told us Steve Buscemmi is beautiful. I think that is the biggest difference. It's a known fact that simply repeating something, even something probably wrong can make people believe it, Marketing uses this to shape our perceptions of things.
A) Science says it is more about facial symmetry than specific features
B) More feminine features on a man/more masculine features on a woman give an androgynous look, when looked at in an unbiased scenario they are more likely to gain interest from a broader spectrum of people
C) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder yadayadayada