You're entitled to your opinion but you should at least be a bit knowledgeable on what you're talking about
Like the people trying to make laws about birth control that don't even know women don't pee from their vagina
Wait, wait, wait! Since when have women peed? I thought they went to the bathroom to touch up their makeup and talk to their friends. My life has been a lie.
You don't need to know about female anatomy to oppose killing babies.
▼
deleted
· 6 years ago
Well its kind of generally a good idea to know where babies come from in the first place.
And abortion isn't the same as "killing babies". You're removing living cells that have the potential to grow into a baby when done in early stages of inhabitation (aka pregnancy) and even after the first trimester it's not even really a proper human baby until the 6 month mark and can survive outside the womb (i.e the uterus).
"removing living cells"
That's what a baby is. But, by that logic, everytime you drink Pepto-Bismol, you commit an abortion.
▼
deleted
· 6 years ago
It's not anywhere near being baby until it at least looks human and has organs (which is about the 5/6 month mark). Its nothing more than a clump of cells until that point.
1
deleted
· 6 years ago
That's nearing the end of the second trimester. By the start of it, babies can feel pain and become(somewhat) sentient. Having an abortion by the second trimester, especially nearing the end, is murder.
See, the second trimester thing actually makes sense, but there's this whole *line* issue - like, I won't get pregnant right now because I live in a state that's a little crazy about this stuff, and due to a couple of hormone disorders there's a decent chance that somewhere in trimester 2 my doctor's gonna be like, "Okay, but if you keep going this is probably gonna kill you and you're *definitely* never getting nerve function in that foot back," and if it's a situation where I have to go out of state then that delays the whole shebang till the baby can *definitely* think and feel pain and might kill *both* of us in the process.
Also, can we please agree that regardless of timing You Do An Abortion For An Ectopic Pregnancy because there is zero chance of either patient surviving that pregnancy?
@abel_hazard Glory and gore go hand and hand!
Jk. I like you. That highlights a point that acts like an eagle and just swoops over their heads; the mother's health.
Though, what's the point in letting a baby be born without a future? Once it's born, both the mother and child have medical expenses that need to be taken care of, along with the cost of diapers, formula, and other supplies, and then the cost of education supplies and the cost of another mouth to feed. It's not as if a fetus stops being important and valuable once it's born. If you're going to abolish abortion, we need to support the children who are outside the womb too, as well as their parents.
Like the people trying to make laws about birth control that don't even know women don't pee from their vagina
I'm a nice guy
And abortion isn't the same as "killing babies". You're removing living cells that have the potential to grow into a baby when done in early stages of inhabitation (aka pregnancy) and even after the first trimester it's not even really a proper human baby until the 6 month mark and can survive outside the womb (i.e the uterus).
That's what a baby is. But, by that logic, everytime you drink Pepto-Bismol, you commit an abortion.
Jk. I like you. That highlights a point that acts like an eagle and just swoops over their heads; the mother's health.