The end is near.

'er' is german for 'he'
*wolpestinges
(es = it)
Or wolptheytingthey

Why don't we start calling people things? Women are objects anyway.

I object to you objectifying wolperthingeys like this

*wolptheytingtheys

Hippity hoppity everyone's a property.

Why’d you edit your comment?

What did the original comment say?

@pokethebear Ppl were down voting so I changed it
@ewqua I said stuff about why aka the meaning of it

And guest, I was told that it was woe + man so idk if it’s true or not then

Yup just looked it up it’s womb and man sry

No, no, no, and no sorry. Has nothing to do with womb or woe. It's from Old English combining wif (adult and female, also where the word wife comes from) + man (human being) to become wifman. Later it morphed into wimman (adult female human) as the f was dropped. In Middle English it morphed again probably caused by the usage of w and it's phonetic sound coupled with a complete lack of standardized spelling. https://www.etymonline.com/word/woman#etymonline_v_10826 So nothing to do with womb and it also needs to be mention that when the word was being created the word man did not mean male it meant human being.

Ur rite but later when it became woman, the wo part of woman was from womb here I’ll send link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman Still, it’s wikipedia so it could be wrong I guess

It literally says it isn't from womb. "It is a popular misconception[5] that the term "woman" is etymologically connected to "womb". "Womb" is actually from the Old English word wambe meaning "stomach" (modern German retains the colloquial term "Wampe" from Middle High German for "potbelly")." Misconception: meaning falsehood, incorrect assumption, or error.

Omg that’s wut I get for not reading it properly