Currently, men are supposed to initiate the meeting process in a culture where asking women who are not mutually interested is deemed harassment. Then there are some women who enjoy the pursuit so they'll say "no" when they really mean "keep pursuing, i enjoy the banter". Finally, the luxury of calling foul on any point in the process is a gift heald only by women.
.
V.S.
.
regularly get hit on by women and all we have to do is say "no thank you" until someone asks who we're interested in.....
.
.
Where do we sign up?
I get what’s being said here but these are REALLY bad examples and I feel most men would actually like at least 2/4 of these and the other 2 they may like and get sick of after awhile or like too. They’re bad examples because of that but also because the “golden rule” of “do unto others as you’d have done unto you” isn’t so literal. I know someone who likes to be insulted and spit on and made to eat from a dog bowl by partners. It took them decades to find the “right partner” to do that and they used to pay money to be treated that way. So should they spit on you because they’d want you to spit on them? No. We all have our differences. The point is that some or many women don’t like these behaviors in general- but that doesn’t necessarily mean that men wouldn’t. Or men may think they’d be ok with until they lived it. We don’t really know. It isn’t important because what me or anyone else likes or is on with isn’t what you are ok with. So I mean… not the best examples…
Maybe it should include a hand signal to indicate that the behavior previously observed is deemed a foul. FWEEET! "Flag on the play, offsides, unwelcome advance, 5 yard penalty. Leave me alone, please."
.
V.S.
.
regularly get hit on by women and all we have to do is say "no thank you" until someone asks who we're interested in.....
.
.
Where do we sign up?