The first Dumbledore was better because he acted like the Dumbledore in the book, but I couldn't really understand him very well. The second one was better because he spoke coherently, but he was waaaaaaay too aggressive.
I agree but i think the good thing about films based on the books, is that they can bring something new to the book that you wouldnt of experienced if the film was exactly as the book portrays :) maybe its just me
Comments