And you have nothing better to do than to stalk a thirty something man? My issue with you is that you stink of hypocrisy. No big deal, just while I'm here.

Well, this looks quite triggered to me. And of course you would think he's a good one cause he got you good. But obviously such trolling can't be too absurd for loads and loads of people to fall for it. If I say that most "SJW" in the net are actually trolls, I have exactly as much evidence as you have for your point of view. So once again: you may as well perform an act of biological reproduction on yourself, you spiritually unattractive bad word for a female body part. Mwah Mwah.
.
Edit: and thanks for the instant red triangle of honor. Not triggered... right...

U triggered? Get a grip... you twits make it way too easy to troll you.

And pretty dumb too as there are cams everywhere nowadays. I prefer to leave a little note saying "Sorry for the dent I made in your car!" and there's no dent of course...

Absolutely right. Our first dog was adopted and nobody really told us the story of what he had experienced, but he was messed up pretty bad. He suddenly attacked my wife in a way I had to get her to the ER and still today her hands have _very_ noticeable scars. We/she made mistakes but then afterwards we found out that we only knew a very small fraction of his history and we were extremely hesitant from then on to consider adoption.

The ad is a spoof, the figures are real.

Opinions are like assholes, you know the rest, right? That was never different. What has changed though is that people honestly believe a couple minutes google research makes their opinion as valid as an experts opinion. That probably came with the participation medals and shit like that.

So climate change doesn't happen for sure and weed for sure has no harmful side-effects? Sure this is what you mean?

Using the numeral wasn't a bad idea, it was an example of a very common misconception. It didn't just explain the right thing in a wrong way. The memist took a perfect example to prove his point. S/he didn't want to argue the fact that it's possible to view a phenomenon from different points of view and justifiably come to different assumptions, but this "Let's agree to disagree" attitude when it comes to verifiable/falsifiable factual statements.

Oh come on you just gotta be kidding me...

All three are based on one local source collection, so it's actually a very small wonder that all "happened" in that tiny area.

Thora, the bible and the quran are based on a set of tales and myths about 3,000 years old, collected in that very area. The book mormon is about 40 years older than Alice in Wonderland. Not saying the first mentioned are in any way more legit, but it's basically different.

They have a lot of gods, as opposed to the monotheistic religion(s) in that area.

Anyone said my name?

Thanks for appreciating my talent! Happy new year to you!

He's an asshole for participating in this type of show in the first place. The concept of these shows is not to create cute children-hugging moments but to make desperate people loose their shit for the people at home to watch. A guy making his money making people cry must be either a psychiatrist or a fucking asshole.