1 ticket please! 8 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Sing it. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. What kind of person needs to tear down another for the act of liking themselves? It’s not even like she is saying she’s the most beautiful woman on earth or anything conceited. She thinks she is beautiful. She is obviously a larger woman; and she is trying to make a statement, bring some awareness to trolls like this that people like her, all people, are human beings. She isn’t furniture or a blight upon society. She’s a human person with feeling who shouldn’t be ignored or insulted because she doesn’t look like you or the way you’d want to look.
1
That money is for football 14 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Yeah. It’s nuts. In my lifetime I’ve paid millions of dollars in taxes and yet they still make me pay money to park on the streets I paid for or to cross the bridges I paid for. One time they gave me a $300 speeding ticket just for driving on the roads I paid for. Where is the Justice?! After spending well over $100,000 the hospital still makes me pay for parking too when I go there. Disney land and 6 flags still charge me to park even with the paid ticket to the park and all the money people spend there- and the damn airport still charges me parking as well after hundreds of thousands of dollars spent there as well! It’s almost as if the price of parking isn’t included in these things and that there’s some sort of pattern of paid parking. I bet your college also makes you pay for your own food (unless you bought a meal pass), and perhaps... gasp. They make you pay for your own toilet paper too? Life is so cruel sometimes. So senselessly unfair.
1
Happy Birthday tooo meee 13 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Happy birthday. I’m sorry they forgot your birthday. Hopefully you liked the presents you bought yourself though?
10
Germany Politics in a nutshell 22 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
But they don’t just say “no” because that would make them accountable. Then you can get upset. If I say “maybe later” then you can’t say “you won’t let me do this thing...” because I can say: “I didn’t say no. I said maybe later.” It’s something people do when they don’t believe what they are saying or aren’t willing to actually commit to a course of action. It’s meaningless filler to head off or end a conversation.
▼
Germany Politics in a nutshell 22 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
It’s non committal. I’ve already set up failure. If I fail- I can say “sorry. I told you I’d try and I did though.” If I say: “I am going to do this thing” and I don’t- then I have to be accountable. I have to say I failed. Explain why I failed. Be responsible for promising and not delivering. “Try” “want” these are like when parents say “let’s maybe talk about that later..” 9/10 times that is a no, there will not be a discussion later unless you bring it up- and the answer may be the same as last time.
▼
Germany Politics in a nutshell 22 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Weasel words and phrases. “I’ll try my best..” ok. Well- firstly- does that mean all the times you didn’t say you’d try your best you weren’t trying your best? Secondly- what is “try?” “I’ll try to go to the gym tomorrow...” Well- I started driving towards the gym, then decided not to go. But... I “tried.” Secondly- “your best.” What does that matter? If you don’t try your best and still succeed you still did what you said. If you try your best and don’t do anything you stop did nothing. The only person who really needs to know if you “tried your best” is you. “Trying your best” not to run over my foot doesn’t do anything for me if you drive over my foot. Do not drive over my foot. If you wanted to do it you were already trying your best.
▼
Germany Politics in a nutshell 22 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
It says: “Germany WANTS to be coal free...” put “want” in one hand and spit in the other. Which hand has something in it? That’s right. “Want” is usually a “weasel word.” It seems like you are saying something but there is no commitment to “want.” You can “want” lots of things you’ll likely never get or even seriously try to get.
▼
Tru dat 11 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Look at plants. We do not respect the intelligence or really- the life of plants because they are so unlike us we generally can’t feel empathy towards them. Those plants we respect tend to be the ones that enhance our lives. The beautiful lawn or flower garden brings you aesthetic joy. It is cared for and protected. The trail brush is trampled because it might as well be beyond your notice. The weed is killed- because it doesn’t do anything for us and we find it disruptive or dangerous to that which we love.
1
Tru dat 11 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
That one is simple. If you feel you are worthy of respect- truly, and you encounter that which reminds you of yourself- you’ll respect it too, because not respecting a mirror of yourself means not truly respecting yourself. We might hate dealing with people like ourselves- the ace lawyer might not get along with the other ace lawyer- but if they respect themselves they will respect the other. If they lose they will dislike losing but respect the skill of the other in defeating them.
1
Tru dat 11 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
So wether we could get along with aliens would depend on many factors- but two major ones are: how “strong” are they? How willing or able are they to better your life? The final outlying factor is of course- how alike or compatible are they and their culture etc. to ours? Narcissism. That being which has true self respect- will tend to respect others like itself.
1
Tru dat 11 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
The equal- the colleague who helps you and works with you tends to be respected. The colleague that takes any chance to undermine you, who criticizes you- they are usually feared more. The majority of people don’t tend to respect those who are lesser than and no threat to or little help to. Beyond perhaps a casual and basic respect as a social formality. You may be respectful towards the barista or your assistant or whomever- but do you truly consider them your equal? Would you say that you both deserve equal pay? Be happy for your child to take that job as a career? Perhaps not thrilled. Because regardless of wether you respect them you know that society doesn’t hold a high respect- and thusly doesn’t offer the benefits of that valuation- for those people.
1
Tru dat 11 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Funny enough this ties into a discussion I was having in another post. The sort of criteria to determine that relies heavily on the aliens relative ability to apply force. If a group is stronger than us we will tend to feel fear and or respect towards it. The degree of each depends much on wether and how much that thing benefits us. The boss which pays your checks and gives you fair assignments tends to be respected. The boss who seeks hostile or disinterested; who meddles and who’s presence usually means bad news tends to be feared.
1
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
And what does that say about a person? A person who is respectful to those with the power to compel them to be but not respectful to those they see as powerless? The old saying: “respect the janitor like you would a ceo” that’s a measure of character, not a literal instruction that of you do just that you’re a good person. It means that you should treat people with respect even if they can’t make you. That’s your call though. I bet you don’t like being disrespected though do you? So.. it’s ok for you to do to others but not for others to do to you?
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Here’s the tell though- you probably wouldn’t look your bosses boss in the eyes of the police officer who stopped you and say “I don’t care what you’re name is. You are Lucy now.” You wouldn’t have someone who is biologically a male tell you they are a man and then insist they are a woman. Those people with power over you- you’ll respect them. Just not people who don’t have a way to hurt you if you disrespect them. You don’t feel the need to tell other people what gender THEY are- just those you think are “wrong.” You know their gender better than them bunny?
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
If we are talking about legal genders- as I said. The principals to allow multiple genders without compromising the effectiveness of a gender classification system already exist and some of those principals are applied and apply from religion. Just as it’s your choice to respect other cultures and religions. Being a bigot or inconsiderate aren’t illegal. You can spout vulgarities at a nun or an imam because you personally don’t give a shit about their beliefs. Call a person who identifies as a non binary gender man or woman even after they’ve asked otherwise.
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
So on a personal level- you get to choose if you want to respect a fellow human being or if you want to be an asshole because respecting them is too much work for you to bother with a simple request. If my name is Jeffrey and I say call me Jeff because my abusive mother called me Jeffrey- the ball is in your court. Be an asshole or not. You decide who you want to be.
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Is it ok to call you “Mrs husbands last name” after you tell me to address you otherwise and within reason? Not “queen and superior god” or some nonsense- but perhaps “Ms. or Mrs. maiden name” or perhaps drop the title? It may not be criminal- but that disrespect sure isn’t welcomed is it? Do women deserve respect? Should husbands need consent from their wives or is it their prerogative based on how sexuality “was”?
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
That’s respect. For other people. Calling them by their name instead of whatever name you make up for them for example. You look like a John to me xvarnah. But John isn’t your name is it?
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
If you see a shrine in a persons home- it isn’t illegal to touch it without their consent if you don’t steal it or damage it. But... what if THEIR faith you do not believe in says not to? What if they specifically ask you not to? That’s pretty damn disrespectful isn’t it? Leaning on a car is legal even if it isn’t yours. Would you like to find me sitting on your car?
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
The religion a person self identifies as- claims as their own- is their business. It doesn’t have to be legally recognized for them to be that religion. Ever hear of the Prince Phillip Movement? It’s an actual faith that a small group of islanders hold. Worshipping a Duke as a deity. It’s a real faith most people have never heard of. But someone answers “what religion are you?” And you make fun because you don’t recognize it or never heard of it- you’re kinda a piece of shit.
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Well my poor @xvarnah- your binary thinking betrays you again. The options aren’t “either we have two genders or we must allow people to think they are trees.” There are many options. Many of them tried and true. One for example- as applied to religion- would require a certain number of people to claim a gender for it to be one that is recognized. It would stipulate that there need be clear and consistent practices and features of this religion. Not 20,000 people all claiming that “do whatever you want” is a religion (or in this case gender.)
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Now we have Jedi! Look at that. How’d that happen, and why isn’t there a “ponderosa pine” religion where people take 365 religious holidays a year to commune with nature, or their religion makes everyone clergy so none of them pay taxes or whatever?
▼
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Derp. I forgot. We did this with religion already. For most of American History some form of Christianity/Catholicism were dominant religions along with Judaism. Chances are a form on religion would ask which you were. Muslim, Sikh any number of other large faiths wouldn’t be recognized. Even the Jews by and large would often go forgotten and people would figure you were some kind of Christian almost by default.
▼
·
Edited 6 years ago
Umm ok 77 comments
guest_
· 6 years ago
Now- your “tree” example. You were lost likely trying to reference how some people may go or be perceived to go to extremes with self identity. Ok. Fair point. We also don’t have an effective classification system of you can say you’re an Apache Helicopter and there’s no way to prove you are one, and no set of defined criteria so you being that and another person. Being that may have nothing in common. What are we to do? How could we prevent abuses and jokers and all the complications of a “choose your own” system?
▼