@sublimegamer have you been listening to a single, goddamn word anyone's been saying? please try to do so in the future. I believe you are getting confused by the idea that their is more to life than our physical bodies, that there is something else, that comprises us.

Yet it is idiotic and completely against science to not follow the currently accepted ideas simply because things have been wrong before. That just gives you free reign to believe whatever the hell you want.

There it is again. Do you have a split personality?

Of course. That's my prime example. Say, someone figured out how to use household supplies to make a small nuke. Obviously, that should be censored.

Same.

Ah, yes, that one.

It's the the same idea.

You always talk in the third person like that?

"Yes, mr putin."

Fucking hell. You know the words, you state the facts, yet clearly have no clue what the hell they mean. Evolution is NOT "just another worldview" it is what the scientific community accepts as true. As I already pointed out, that is the only logical thing to be done, accept something as true unless a better(more fact based) explanation comes along. And as much as we can prove pretty much everything else, we can prove what happened in the past. And yes, it's not "absolute" proof, but nothing is, least of all your little fairytale. And within that framework, evolution is a far better theory. Creationism is theoretically unsound because it is incomplete. It does not explain the mechanism by which life was created, nor does it say where gods(with no proof these even exist) came from. Now, please do explain how evolution doesn't fit with natural laws, mr "I know better than actual scientists."