Winry's the best.

@yukihaki As I said, I was just giving examples that were based off statistics on education as a job requirement. But okay, we got that solved and agreed upon.
@smitty Now now, I never said these jobs don't require skill. They certainly do. But they don't require higher education. That's why plumbers, truck drivers, construction workers and what not obviously need training to know what they're doing, but their job mostly relies on manual labour, therefore they don't really need to know anything else beyond their line of work. I acknowledge that they need some training and even certificates to do their job, but a two months long training is a whole different thing than years of university education.

Sure, sure, you're nitpicking right now. But why do you have a problem with me putting McDonalds employees and plumbers as examples of uneducated people? I know they're not all stupid, in fact two of my high school classmates work there to earn some extra money while in college, but apart from students, you will hardly find an ambitious, intelligent person there. And as to what concerns plumbers, construction workers and other manual labor workers, those are jobs you don't need higher education for, therefore it's more likely to find uneducated people there. It's statistics and facts, what's wrong with that? People who need a bachelor degree for their job will obviously be statistically smarter and more educated than people who don't, that's a (trigger warning) fact.

What are YOU talking about? I proposed a standardized, anonymously graded system of testing people's knowledge in order to vote and you say it wouldn't work because I'm discriminating against smart garbagemen? SJW logic...

^ Thank you.

Examples. It's called examples. I know they're not all stupid, but truth be told you're more likely to find an idiot among those than among CEOs.
Also, you want to take reproductive rights from people, I tell you why it's not possible, and I'm the one being harsh? A bit hypocritical dude.

I have to disagree with you there. If the population was full of ambitious, intelligent individuals, then who would do the shitty but vital jobs? Sterilisation of stupid people will only be possible when we've fully automatized these jobs, until then we have to cope with them and smile and wave them goodbye after they fixed our plumbing or made our fries at McDonalds. The problem is that because of democracy, these people will keep voting for people like Trump or Hillary. Which is why I'd start the "purge" by introducing tests of political knowledge to voters. Those who would fail would still vote, but a) their vote wouldn't count or would make up a half/quarter of a vote of a person who'd pass, b) we wouldn't tell them it doesn't count because they might not like that, there would be riots and civil war and other bothers.

I know, right? It's such an easy game.
"You rape the cow" now I'm just imagining some farmer shagging his cow because he wants to make human-cow hybrids...leaving animals of two sexes together in one place hardly counts as rape

Same

To be fair I think kids do suck the life out of you. But not literally of course and it takes them some time.

Haha, good point.

1. Pick purple
2. Run for president
3. Make bigots and idiots admit they're stupid and therefore guilt trip them into voting for you
4. ??????
5. Profit

I don't think that's the right approach since they could just make universal desks. We can't change the way we write, and even though I am able to write with my right hand relatively decently, it would just slow me down. The advantage of lefties is that a lot of them can write with both hands, but one will always be dominant.

I know but hilariously enough the author compiled them so they're next to each other. That's what's funny about it.

Eco-friendly = shitty toilet paper won't swim in the ocean and maybe will be recycled. Also the bin had a lid so it wasn't that big of a problem, but as I said, still kinda gross.