They probably smell weird too

This is so painfully true. I always hope that directors can transfer the brilliance of some books to the screen, but they almost always fail. (;_;)

The movie Tuck Everlasting was actually better than the book because they made Winnie 15 instead of 10/11 years old and Jesse did not look like a pervert that way

What was with @sexxybooks

I'm going to have nightmares about that picture of the cat in the hat :/

That's not necessarily true. I don't think you can say someone is wrong, and more importantly call someone stupid, when it's a matter of opinion
...
It's like this:
You: What's your favourite colour?
Person: blue :)
You: lol, that's wrong, stupid!
...
Don't be rude please. No one likes that.

I would usually agree but I think in some cases this isn't true, for example I much preferred the movie version of The Hobbit, simply because the book is so short there was hardly any time to actually form any sort of emotional attachment to the characters, whereas in the movie I was genuinely moved at the deaths at the end of the movie.

Another exception was Bridget Jones's Diary II. I hated the book but the movie was funny and much closer in spirit to the original Bridget Jones novel.