And I'd still be the perv if someone complained about it

Go on... ahead.

Finally something I can get behind.

I have to agree. The comparison doesn’t really make sense. Guys can already show “underboob” or whole boob if they want in more places than women are allowed. As a fun asides though- several rulings have allowed women not wearing bottoms to not suffer indecent exposure charges as if the labia minora don’t protrude past the labia majora, and you have sufficient pubic hair, the female genitals aren’t exposed when a naked woman is standing or walking, at least no more so than in legal levels of clothing to most parts of the world. However the comparison of male to female nudity is often silly. It isn’t equivalent exchange based on body parts, but on social conuctations of body parts. Men’s bodies simply aren’t viewed as sex objects or given the sexual significance of women’s bodies in most cultures. It’s not that “equal exposure” would make us “equal”, but that if society values men and women equally in the same ways equality in law would be a natural biproduct of those valuations.

It’s the distinction of being told by a person to but them a present for a special event, or extend them basic manners or courtesy, and then doing so out of obligation; to doing such an act because you genuinely appreciate or respect them. It’s not an issue of simple action as appeasement but in showing ones thoughts and feelings towards others through actions that reflect their inherent values.