Every time trump says “fake news” this is what I think

Honest attempt to answer: I think they're saying believing information is invalid just because someone in political power declares it to be untrustworthy does not, in fact, mean the information is untrustworthy.
'
Sometimes it just means the person in power dislikes what's being said, and so will do everything they can to discredit it.
'
Moral of the story: Both sides have agendas. If you blindly believe either, you could spend a very large amount of time defending/fighting for a cause or person that, in reality, is unjust, unfair, and you don't believe in. And, in reality, you're likely part of the problem.
'
Admittedly, a lot of people wouldn't have cared whether Hitler was lying or not. They wanted and needed a rallying cry, and the Nazis provided that. Much the same as Trump has done in a lot of scenarios. And, no, I'm not calling Trump Hitler, or a Nazi, so don't open that can of worms based on this comment please

I like this very moderate answer.

Even though Trump is being used as an example, the point is that this is happening every day, everywhere. Maybe not as exploitive and striking as with the Donald, but it's a global phenomenon. And last not least, you're right, Trump would never be brave or smart enough to ban guns.

How often do you use guns @f_kyeahhamburg?

I think it’s the frequency and intensity that is the difference. The fact that President Trump uses nicknames like “Crooked” Hillary and The “Failing” New York Times is particularly cringey to me. The President is supposed to be somewhat dignified.

Just because he's a cringey asshole doesn't mean he's a Nazi.

If you want to stereotype, you could at least do it properly. Being easily offended is much more of a liberal thing.

That statement is not consistent with all the wingnut whining we get here every time the word "Nazi" is mentioned.