Not even correct. Pants were not invented "for men." Iirc women in colder climates often wore long types of them under their skirts for warmth - which, incidentally, is also what a lot of men were doing. Wearing them as undergarments beneath tunics and such. It took some time for them to become popular as outerwear. Other cultures simply had them worn for convenience. Some places in Europe leggings became more prominent because the MEN kept shortening their tunics to unseemly lengths wanting to show off THEIR legs.
'
Men were largely responsible for heeled shoes as well, btw
"highlight her legs, curves and rear end" her body. You mean her body. The thing that everybody has with or without clothes get your head out of the gutter and start seeing people as people and not sex toys.
Also did we all forget 19th century dresses that were made to emphasize the size of your butt? Or corsets made to reduce your waist?
Dresses were traditionally made to compliment a feminine figure. If he wanted to rant about people oversexualizing themselves or something, dresses would be the logical place to start.
But of course, he's Roosh V, he doesn't have a principled, nuanced argument about over sexualization, he just wants to return to the 50s and have a slave-wife.
(Side note: not that I think there even is an argument to be made about sexualization in terms of people's everyday attire in the first place. In terms of culture and media there is, we all know that sex sells better than good art, but not for the average Jane who just wants to wear pants without being yapped at by neckbeards)
Based on this post alone it's easy to tell he's an idiot. He has no interest in trivial things like historical facts, logic, or accuracies, and instead whips out two topics that don't actually have anything to do with one another (the history of pants and his own libido) and uses that as a platform to lash out at women in particular.
.
He's also verified, which is usually the first warning sign
I mean, Google him and you'll know. He used to be a misogynistic pick up artist, he kept records of all women he's slept with (wrote books about it too) and argued that rape is fine, among other atrocious things. Then he converted to Jesusism and turned into a bonkers fundamentalist and now he's equally misogynistic but he's all about no sex before marriage.
What a personal journey that must've been. I'm sure he did a lot of soul searching to turn from a slutty misogynist to a sexless misogynist.
'
Men were largely responsible for heeled shoes as well, btw
Dresses were traditionally made to compliment a feminine figure. If he wanted to rant about people oversexualizing themselves or something, dresses would be the logical place to start.
But of course, he's Roosh V, he doesn't have a principled, nuanced argument about over sexualization, he just wants to return to the 50s and have a slave-wife.
(Side note: not that I think there even is an argument to be made about sexualization in terms of people's everyday attire in the first place. In terms of culture and media there is, we all know that sex sells better than good art, but not for the average Jane who just wants to wear pants without being yapped at by neckbeards)
.
He's also verified, which is usually the first warning sign
What a personal journey that must've been. I'm sure he did a lot of soul searching to turn from a slutty misogynist to a sexless misogynist.