Unknown. What is considered an “item” is not defined nor is “to the right of you”- the closest thing to the right of most people would likely be an atmospheric gas such as methane or oxygen, or perhaps dead skin cells or mites.
The other hitch comes in the phrase: “Is your weapon…” this is ambiguous. It IS my weapon- meaning that whatever it is, it is implied that there is some inherent capacity to weaponize it. For example- if oxygen IS my weapon- I have no means by which to use a molecule or free collection of oxygen as a weapon- so to be MY weapon- I would need to be able to use it as a weapon. Being able to generate, control, or otherwise somehow mechanically or supernaturally use oxygen or methane as a gas would be a theoretically incredibly strong weapon. To be a weapon a thing must be capable of being used as a weapon- otherwise it is not a weapon but a tool or resource or other term. So there is a good deal of potential ambiguity and interpretation to the question.
If I am allowed to set the definitions then I would likely be ok because the “atmosphere” might be the thing I would consider the closest item- and if I am able to weaponize the atmosphere by my own definitions, I would have little to fear. Likewise one might claim certain other particles of physics as “items” or various fields etc. which would be incredibly powerful. Some of it comes down to theory- wether gravity is a physical thing and thusly able to be considered an item or wether time and special dimensions count as physical and can be called items and such.
The other hitch comes in the phrase: “Is your weapon…” this is ambiguous. It IS my weapon- meaning that whatever it is, it is implied that there is some inherent capacity to weaponize it. For example- if oxygen IS my weapon- I have no means by which to use a molecule or free collection of oxygen as a weapon- so to be MY weapon- I would need to be able to use it as a weapon. Being able to generate, control, or otherwise somehow mechanically or supernaturally use oxygen or methane as a gas would be a theoretically incredibly strong weapon. To be a weapon a thing must be capable of being used as a weapon- otherwise it is not a weapon but a tool or resource or other term. So there is a good deal of potential ambiguity and interpretation to the question.