And I'm pretty sure there shouldn't have been sirens, gunshots and drifting.

Define 'important'. Why not define 'morals'? In fact, define 'truth'. We must get the basics down first (religion/origins) before we can enjoy these things of life.

I also think science fits perfectly with the Creation world view (6000yrs), way moreso than the Evolution world view.

Why did you have to ask a question that could spark a religious debate?

That's exactly why evolution should Not be labeled a 'theory'. It cannot be proven with observational science in the here and now. It is not observable, or repeatable, within our timespan, so it shouldn't even be called a hypothesis. And seeing as it relies on events that go against well established laws of nature (like biogenesis), it should be called, by definition, a supernatural belief.
Note that I am not talking about the scientific 'micro-evolution' i.e. dog breeds, which is true science, but rather 'macro-evolution' i.e. apes to humans.

I agree with all of that, but I still think evolution is not science. There has been to much evidence put Against it.

Why are we asking these questions?

Hey. Hey. Post it again. It will create emphasis.

I thought it was a plastic dinosaur

Just don't look down

It's as if they're punishment.

^ this

Me too. Overwatch has just blown my socks off.

How about 'guyf'