Literally!

Not to be confused with Don't knows.

Simons I call Kevins.

All of the above?

Yes. Science. What is that exactly? Is it observable, testable, repeatable, and predictable? Because evolution and certain historical 'sciences' are none of these things. And yet, evolution is presented in the textbooks as irrefutable fact, even though it is extremely lacking in examples of evolution. There are even deliberate lies left in the textbooks, that many people have told the curriculum about, but nothing has been done to correct the mistakes. That sounds less like science and more like a forced doctrine.

It might not be a 'religion' in the sense of believing in a God, but it does imply supernatural events such as abiogenesis and mass travelling faster than light, thus making it a faith. You cannot entirely prove what happened in the past without direct human observation at that time, so you have to believe that the Big Bang happened, don't you?

You're welcome @silvermyth!

There is a spiritual battle going on within our world, and so we see the Enemy trying to discourage us by having other people make hateful comments without any reason. It is not merely a case of right or wrong, nor just of different opinions. It is a spiritual war going on around us. If the Devil sees we are making a stand for Jesus, won't he try to extinguish it? He will desperately throw negativity, hatred, and other obstacles at us to try and make us back down from defending God. We need to stand strong in our position and fight for what we believe is true. Shouldn't we?

Yeah! I am fed up and tired of people ridiculing our religion, and not having the courage to stomach their own medicine. Some say we can take a joke, but I say we shouldn't have to in the first place.

Vote Lassie 2016
Make Timmy great again!

She cannot answer that one!

Good morning Agent P. We've received word that the nefarious evil scientist Dr Doofenshmirtz has... uh... Carl! What did he do again?

I'm not sure we do

Yes. Tiktaalik was a fossil that evolutionists thought would fit the bill as an intermediate fossil (missing link) between fish and tetrapods. They "dated" the rocks it was found in to be 375 million years old. A little while later in Poland they found fossilised, fully-formed tetrapod footprints in rocks they dated 379 million years old. Sooo... That means Tiktaalik was not in fact an intermediate link, because tetrapods were already around. And yet all the press and media continued to hail Tiktaalik as the ancestor of all tetrapods. Why?
http://www.livescience.com/6004-legged-creature-footprints-force-evolution-rethink.html
Even in the article you linked they falsely stated that Tiktaalik came 12 million years before the first tetrapods, so how come there are tetrapod footprints that came 4 million years before Tiktaalik?

And to @funsubstanceuser, your argument about scriptures' trustworthiness is a problem for all religions, including atheism. Some people are willing to believe what people mere decades ago said happened billions of years ago. Other people are willing to believe what people thousands of years ago said happened during their time.

I agree with you @skittles, but sometimes debates about religion can and will turn into negative conflicts. It is inevitable. Don't be discouraged to share your point of view. Especially if you truly believe your faith is the right one.

I think it's his base of operations

And the green part of Greenland!

I must be making trillions!