It's better for the baby to breastfeed generally, for a number of reasons, one of the biggest being the secondhand immunity to disease that breastmilk provides to the baby. There are a number of reasons one might choose to not breastfeed, but it's usually better for he baby to do so, especially during the first few months.
Note: no judgement if you don't breastfeed, just trying to help explain the issue.

No man... that's the Stuff!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Stuff
(Pretty good movie btw, watch it if you haven't.)

BLASPHEMY!!!!

*has flashbacks to r/PrequelMemes*

I'm sure it was worse than that, that sounds like a cataclysm!

To be fair, they had expert timing.

I DOOOOOOOO

I have. It told me to study. Which is completely unrealistic.

Don't think I haven't noticed you using them as a pillow during movie night.

Trust me, not every billionaire would be Batman. Being a Bat in general sucks if you aren't ready to get the shit kicked out of you.

It doesn't contain the antibodies that babies need to gain early immunity though. Until they're old enough to vaccinate, babies can only gain immunity through their mother's breast milk, which has the antibodies that the mother's body has already produced.
Edit: ANTIBODIES, not ANTIGENS.

Excuse me?

Haha, I'm bigger than you!

Sorry, but there's no bats on there. There has to be at least 3 bats or bat related puns in order for anything to be used by us.

Thank god he finally got taller than me. That was an awkward few years before that.

Jeez guys, I leave for a week or two and come back to this? What am I supposed to do when finals come in a few weeks?

Imagine a Smash Bros style fighting game consisting of only PBS people. Bob Ross vs. Bill Nye. Elmo vs. Mr. Rogers.
(I don't care if Sesame Street isn't on PBS anymore, it is in my heart)

"Nani?!"

Take his face...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... off?