im good
how are you?
*hugs @aviva*

*offers a comforting hug*

:D hey das me!

everyone went to hades, but there were different areas of hades for different people, one for bad people one for normal people and one for heroes.

*hugs @catfluff*
*readies pan*

just to put a bit of information to this, when people got dragged away they would often take off their masks and scream their name and proclaim that they will not commit suicide so that, should they be killed, it couldnt be covered up by a fake suicide nearly as easily.

*hugs back* :D

example of the intuitively correct thing being wrong: the Monty hall problem

@creativedragonbaby
the tl:dr is basically "the culture in which christianity was formed would have found asexuality to be problematic if said asexuality extended past marriage, prevented marriage or prevented the sexing of their spouse for the purpose of baby making. but now its a very mixed bag"

he's fully within his lane and the cyclist with the camera is far enough ahead that even if the one that got hit wasnt there the car is still breaking the law by coming back into the lane at that close to the cyclist, not to mention the fact that both the car and the truck are breaking the law by passing at all as they are in a double line zone.

the only further thing i have to say about that is the thing about money lenders, jesus would likely have still not liked them moneylending, even in the name of the church, because they saw any kind of moneylending, even no interest pay exactly back what you got given, as a waste and bad for society and humanity.

just gonna say, since the reason that homosexuality was considered bad in ancient times was a general air of waste being considered bad and that homosexuality was a waste of "seed and egg" in males and females respectively (which is the same reason that moneylending was considered evil, they considered it making nothing out of nothing and a huge waste of time, not to mention the whole debt thing)
id say chances are they would look at asexuality in a bad light, celibacy is good in that belief set but by the same belief set you are meant to get married and have children by the will of god so an asexual individual such as myself that would prefer to not do the whole sex thing (and even if i did id be dating a girl anyways which is a whole nother can of worms) would probably be considered a problem.

i mean if too many took a stand like that there probably wouldnt be any holocaust survivors freed by allied forces cause they all died before that.

depends, the speed he threw it, chances are if one is shorter it would make it dip and smack into the one after the shorter ones

*offers @popsy a hug*

back quivers were only really used in massed combat in the past, in any situation where you have room to draw from the hip its generally better to do so and its generally considered best practice today, tho personal preference usually overrides what people know is better since speed of shooting doesnt really matter today.

@popsy i basically dont even exist, barely a memory if even that

"coupled with the controller you are comfortable with"
you can use whatever controller you want and more than one kind of controller and switch between which controllers you like on different games on a pc without having to buy multiple PCs for each controller type. hell you could play a game with one xbox controller, one ps4 controller, and a wii remote
plus, the ability to run only games on the machine is a bit moot when the hardware on the machine makes the fact its monotask still not enough to outpace the multitask machine with better internals in performance and visuals.
"I think a significant part of console appeal is the cost efficiency relative to pc. A console costs $400-600 and can be equivalent to a $1.5K-2.5K PC"
No, For any console out there you can build a stronger PC cheaper, the perception that consoles are cheaper for the same price is a myth and one that needs to die. Especially with that EXTREME assertion that a 600 dollar console can be equivalent to 1500 dollar pc.

deflecting it wouldnt work, swords in general and katanas especially are really weak from side to side impacts. if the shot is centered enough on the target there would theoretically be less movement to draw a katana than to dodge and more importantly less time to do the movement. a thick enough sword would cause the two halves to split at a large enough angle to not hit the person using the sword.
while yes, the trope is kinda dumb, its dumb because the sword would break if its non-magical. the shot most people are taught to take (center mass) is the one most likely to make drawing a sword take less time than dodging the bullet, so no, trying to deflecting or dodging the bullet are not inherently better options