Same idea as u/Eudald_C but in the style of Apple UIKit 13 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
I’m the one downvoting you. You think you’re so entitled to an explanation you can’t even see what’s right in front of you. Stop dog whistling.
Forgot to add: I use neo pronouns. I don’t identify with the gender binary. I’m the hypothetical person you’re talking about.
·
Edited 4 weeks ago
Forgot to add: I use neo pronouns. I don’t identify with the gender binary. I’m the hypothetical person you’re talking about.
Same idea as u/Eudald_C but in the style of Apple UIKit 13 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
That’s what I was asking you about. What third and beyond genders are you familiar with? I haven’t encountered any yet and would love to learn about the ones you have.
Edit to add: the graph is reductive because the concept is reductive. Even cultures that name additional genders frame them in the context of masculine, feminine, or the absence thereof. I don’t fault the graph for not breaking new ground on concepts that humans haven’t even been able to really articulate.
·
Edited 4 weeks ago
Edit to add: the graph is reductive because the concept is reductive. Even cultures that name additional genders frame them in the context of masculine, feminine, or the absence thereof. I don’t fault the graph for not breaking new ground on concepts that humans haven’t even been able to really articulate.
Pulled cynical infatuated 2 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
The Bored Panda screenshot is making me sad. At least click through and screenshot the post they scraped their content from
1
Same idea as u/Eudald_C but in the style of Apple UIKit 13 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
But not being on those spectrums is right there at 0,0. That’s what that means. Neither.
Same idea as u/Eudald_C but in the style of Apple UIKit 13 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
Let’s say we added an axis for “over time” to help out the fluid folks, what else would you put as additional axis? Help me out here because I hover near the 0,0 (agender, with some residual ingrained biases), but I’m really not very familiar with other non-binary expressions.
Same idea as u/Eudald_C but in the style of Apple UIKit 13 comments
ghostwolfe
· 4 weeks ago
Considering that it lets you choose anywhere from “null both” to “strong both”, it covers the spectrum pretty well.
1
Unfairness 5 comments
ghostwolfe
· 3 years ago
It's testosterone, and it's also why guys tend to have eyelashes to die for.
2
Yes please! 2 comments
ghostwolfe
· 3 years ago
I read about this (or a similar mushroom) years ago. Turns out it's one of those "maybe works for a small percentage of people, otherwise it's just the worst smelling thing ever" deals.
5
The texture of the PS5 controller close up 5 comments
Spice up hunting season this year 2 comments
sad 18 comments
ghostwolfe
· 3 years ago
I stumbled on dyscalculia by accident, I think. But a lifetime of face blindness, counting on my fingers, inability to read maps, inability to do math in my head, and utter failure at spatial reasoning all fits >.<
Bowling with cats 4 comments
ghostwolfe
· 3 years ago
Untrue. My dog, and the one before her, wiggles like a demon if you try to put her down gently. It's a struggle between her not hurting herself and her not hurting herself even worse if she escapes e.e
Try something new, for once 2 comments
Bros we can do it 2 comments
ghostwolfe
· 3 years ago
I worry about him in the long run. Is there sufficient demand for his business? Does he have the support he needs to run a business? Does he have a plan for dealing with problematic customers and staff?
Space will be the end of our oat surplus 5 comments
I think there are great conversations to be had about how things currently associated with gender could be recategorised, but this is, as you say, a real half-baked way to go about it.