Again, explain how that affects the feasibility of the rule.

Yeah. It's not like there already is or anything.

I think in the second one he's just flexing.

So I'm the bitch for asking people to be intelligent? The problem with our civilization, ladies and gentleman.

Ok. Please explain the connection between my hating dogs and the enforceability of such a law.

Haven't got the time, sadly.

But he only would've become king after the old one died.

Divorce him then marry him again.

Such a great age.

They may have been told to ask the first, but not the second. And a stupid question is a stupid question.

No. I hate flawed reasoning and will call it out whenever I see it.

Fair enough. I do the same.

Better person? No way to tell. But it certainly looks as though I'm smarter than you. You have said nothing to address my origional point. So he's hugging the guy. First of all, this is very symbolic and all, but what does it actually do? Now my second point was actually based off misreading your comment. I thought you said "he has a good heart." Regardeless, my point still applies. As someone else says, he thinks being trans is a disease, so how would he treat them? True goodness is how you treat those who fall outside your lines and how he treats people like that is far more telling of who he is as a person.which is not to say that your wrong, just that using this to say he's a good person is total bullshit.

Downvotes without a response, another fs classic.

He embraces a disfigured man, so he has to,have good in his heart. Sounds like reasoning to me. Flawed reasoning, as I explained. And in true funsubstance fashion, you are attacking me for pointing out innacuracies/inconsistencies/flaws in your claim instead of actually listening.

It depends. I don't know enough about him to say. All I'm doing us pointing out that your logic is flawed.