Idgaf what delegates think though and we dont know that and im saying hypothetically if there was a split down the middle not one side should be able to force their beliefs on another.

yeah but if there is a division in it then its not widely accepted and 9 people dont get to say what is widley accepted.

why are they more educated on an idea that has no right or wrong and get to determine which way it goes they still shouldnt be allowed to determine ethics. A majority can but 9 people just because their educated cant

no one can say someones morals are better then others because morals are morals. A phd does not mean you have better morals. A higher education does not mean you have better morals.

im not saying they are idiots but im not saying they are in positions to determine morals for the a country that has population of 321 million people.

so 9 people get to decide the morals for the rest of the country? No the supreme court gets to determine there rights as protected by the constitution. Which the constitution if i recall does not tell people they are allowed to assist in someones death.

but what if half the population disagrees. What if 1/3 says no 1/3 says complete assisted suicide and then 1/3 says hey i want it like how you want it. then who gets to determine that. Does 1 opinion usurp another? or is there some kind of tie breaker?

there we go that is all i had to prove was that not all assisted suicide is legal. Who gets to determine the extent of assisted suicide though?

what about depression last for a long time do you condone assisted suicide answer the question.

yeah but people dont know best either or sometimes they arent thinking right. People still feel the weight regardless of consent. What about suicide based on depression will you assist that.

It can be regulated but it doesnt mean its gonna happen. Not to mention you are spreading stds to people and it is non productive. it does nothing for society.

Assisted suicide is a broad term it can be because they are depressed in which most cases is true. That is unhealthy and not right because someone has emotional problems they should just kill themselves. It is selfish because you are abandoning other people because all you are thinking about is you. IF you are depressed you are giving up on everybody that has loved you because you cant handle it. In fact the one assisting you you are forcing them to have the weight of killing you on them all the time that aint right.

assisted suicide is more than that. I think that someone who wants to die is extremely selfish i also believe that most suicide cases stem from temporary issues and not thinking clearly at the time. Also you are allowing a women to harm herself and in most prostitution cases its not voluntary. She is forced to prostitution from gangs they dont do it because they love it 9/10 times.

no dude this is wrong. I do agree with marijuana and abortion is legal but seriously you are willing to help somebody kill themselves and then allow people to whore out their bodies what is wrong with you from a humanitarian stand point.

i get that but i think prostitution is a terrible thing that is not as voluntary as people think i think it spreads around tons of stds and is a lowering of our society. Not to mention that it is an occupation that is not productive in any way shape or form.

need

I think mayweather is too old

what animals have gone extinct or close to it? Tigers are one and guess what tigers take miles and miles of territory. DoDo's are another and they were extremely unintelligent. Im not saying we can just kill every animal but im saying animals like the tiger dont seem worth keeping if we can find one that does the job easier, animals do evolve btw elephants have began to be born without tusks. no one is changing an enviornment completely within days and months. In most cases we are not allowed to expand in certain areas or do anything that might obstruct animals. This also is irrelevant because what im saying is i would pick humans over animals sure if i could save a large portion of humans by hunting down the remaining tigers i would.

im sure you do but most people especially people who you dont know in real life would not find it funny and would be able to assume you are racist with good reason.

its the animals lack of evolution that is the reason it has gone extinct. Animals if they really are worth keeping alive they need to learn to evolve. For example dogs are wolves that evolved around humans therefore are thriving in this world. Humans are more valuable then dogs humans are much more intelligent and can create technology that really makes us superior in every way. Do not try to up play dogs. Dogs are dogs they are cute companions who are loyal but that is about it. Humans have understood more about this world than all the animals combined will ever know we invent things that make us the strongest most efficient creatures on earth. You for some reason seem to not have pride for your own race.

It has nothing to do about innocence it has to do with what really matters most humans have longer life spans and can do more for the earth and society than animals.