DUDE, it was a fucking kid! You know what's really sad? That dead kid saw robbing some innocent people's houses as a better option than focusing on his studies and shit.
Because the liberal media would never let on they they were wrong about gun control.
.
If coverage continues on this, they are going to shift all attention away from effective home defense and talk about their ages and why they were home alone.
.
I guarantee it.
Why would they not?
Sure. Once in awhile you get a story where the good guys win, but not all gun-toting tots are created equal. Kinda like adults. And you know WE can't all be trusted with weapons half the time.
Bullshit. There were witnesses and an accomplice. He was guilty, no doubt about it. As such, breaking into someone's house you deserve whatever defense is waiting on the other side of the door.
Do you not understand the true value and preciousness of a human life? Do you even understand how impossible and unlikely human conscienceness is? Every human life, no matter peacemaker or convicted murderer, is extremely precious.
- Also: I can't spell precious
▼
deleted
· 8 years ago
Yes, you can spell precious and, more importantly, what about the precious life of the two children? Does their life not matter?
Actually, witnesses report that the sixteen year-olds weren't trying to break in at all, they were just talking with the eleven year-old outside. So yes, their guilt is doubtful, and no, he did not deserve to die even if he was guilty.
Why was the 11 year old looking after the 4 year old all on his own in the first place?! Especially if the mother got the gun to protect them from intruders!
From the story i read, and I dont know if it's a legit source. But the neighbours are saying they heard the 11yo and the 16yo arguing out side then he got shot. Apparently the 16yo never entered the house; and the 11yo is being charged with murder not self defence.
Two witnesses saw the boys talking with each other outside before the shooting, with one reporting that the 11yo was trying to buy a phone from them. There are no signs of forced entry on the door and it was the middle of the day. This likely wasn't some heroic act of self defense; it was a child killing a slightly older child with almost no provocation, which is exactly why gun control is necessary.
That kid is a gamer or he goes to a gun range a lot. Only way he could nail headshot. But, i also feel bad because that must have been terrifying. I hope the family will be ok
I game nearly every day, mostly FPS games, and I can't aim for shit, a controller (or mouse) does not even come close to a real gun. The latter option is the only way he could've done that, or it was a lucky shot.
guns save lives --> wtf. How does anyone benefit from this situation. A SIXTEEN year old kid is dead and an ELEVEN year old boy has to live the rest of his life knowing he has killed someone. Guns really provide more hindrance than help.
For those of you who are defending the 16 year olds, if there was someone trying to break into my house, and they manage to, I would shoot them. What are you expected to do? Call 911? By the time the cops are there they would probably broken in.
Who is going to take the time to aim when someone breaks into your home? "Like oh no some punk broke in I'm going to take my time to specificily aim at his foot at which I could miss or he could tackle me."
2
deleted
· 8 years ago
Dude still, it was a kid. A kid! He had his whole life ahead of him. The real criminals here are the peoplr who never cared for these kids enough so much so they became the scum of the earth
It's not like he wanted to kill someone. If some breaks into your house you're gonna freak the fuck out too. Though I do wonder why the hell the mom didn't lock the gun up
How did the kid know to shoot the gun anyway, is what I wanna know. Shooting a gun is not easy, you have to take the safety off, propery load it, etc. How could and eleven year old possibly do all of this I wonder? Seems shady to me.
My dad taught me to shoot when I was 5. By the time I was 11 I was a crack shot with a multitude of firearms and had the knowledge and respect to handle them safely as second nature.
2
deleted
· 8 years ago
That was not murder; it was self defense. And in case anybody is going to bring up the commandments, it's not "thou shall not kill"...it's "thou shall not murder". The boy did kill, he did not murder.
But we also left the glock.....dessert?
.
If coverage continues on this, they are going to shift all attention away from effective home defense and talk about their ages and why they were home alone.
.
I guarantee it.
Sure. Once in awhile you get a story where the good guys win, but not all gun-toting tots are created equal. Kinda like adults. And you know WE can't all be trusted with weapons half the time.
- Also: I can't spell precious
Or mentally disturbed because of his guilt... But probably the first one.