Well- there’s a philosophical quandary here. People catch and kill fish for no reason, or to use as decorations. Wether one considered that cruel personally or not is individual. Then again- what of fish harvested for use in industrial lubricants or as medicine or food additives? A common emulsifier used in things like milk shakes is made by killing huge cats of tiny organisms and grinding the “skeletons” they leave behind. So wether out of necessity or just for our enjoyment we routinely kill fish to use for things other than food- and while on the subject...
... we can also argue that most of the time we don’t need to eat fish or Jamal’s we kill for food and could survive with other food sources. Leather and other decorative or non essential items are commonly take. From animals we kill for no other purpose or who we just allocate the “left overs” after the fact. So one may or may not deem it cruel but most of us can hardly say we aren’t as guilty as he is of being cruel in similar fashion.
Comments