That's the spirit! Live for spite when you have nothing else. I promise, you'll find something. If not, tomorrow is always another chance to spit on God.
Whatever gets you through it tbh.
.
Although long term depression will have actual physical ramifications - as will living in a constant state of bitter hostility
.
Just look at what it's already done to the frog population
@happy_frog
If you think I should say more, I'm ecstatic to oblige. I recently found out that the 5th Generation Glock 19 has stock sight posts that are about 200ths of an inch higher than typical. Though I haven't been able to get hands on conduct my own tests, I've heard that this difference of a fraction of an inch is having a profound effect on some pistoleers. A couple I know personally to be capable of extraordinary feats of accuracy with their older model Glocks are maintaining their high precision, but the shots are grouping low. This can of course be mitigated by aftermarket sights, or even electronic optics. But I don't like that Glock allowed that kind of change to pass unannounced or compensated for.
@happy_frog
Granted, I'm not the biggest fan of Glocks in the first place. Though cheap and durable, I've found their factory trigger to be squishy even for a striker fired pistol vs a hammer fired one, I find the shape of the weapon awkward to carry, the weight settles strangely while aiming, the grip angle is too far deviated from other handguns, and the sights have a propensity to cover most of the target even at 20 feet. Nevermind that the shape of the grip is simply too bulky for people with smaller hands to comfortably wrap around it. Which isn't great for ergonomics.
Granted, I understand their popularity. Reliable, low maintenance, few controls, no manual safety, and cinematic saturation does make them a good pistol for home defense or military service, and a great handgun for new enthusiasts. Especially taking into account the vast aftermarket it has accrued. Funny to imagine that the "Glock" was the company's first foray into firearms?
@xvarnah
From what I've found? It was too comply with a military contract. I don't understand either, because that height is not near elevated enough to peek over any suppressor or compensator that it can't already see over
.
Although long term depression will have actual physical ramifications - as will living in a constant state of bitter hostility
.
Just look at what it's already done to the frog population
@famousone Oh, spit on God. Good idea, I'll go do that right away.
If you think I should say more, I'm ecstatic to oblige. I recently found out that the 5th Generation Glock 19 has stock sight posts that are about 200ths of an inch higher than typical. Though I haven't been able to get hands on conduct my own tests, I've heard that this difference of a fraction of an inch is having a profound effect on some pistoleers. A couple I know personally to be capable of extraordinary feats of accuracy with their older model Glocks are maintaining their high precision, but the shots are grouping low. This can of course be mitigated by aftermarket sights, or even electronic optics. But I don't like that Glock allowed that kind of change to pass unannounced or compensated for.
Granted, I'm not the biggest fan of Glocks in the first place. Though cheap and durable, I've found their factory trigger to be squishy even for a striker fired pistol vs a hammer fired one, I find the shape of the weapon awkward to carry, the weight settles strangely while aiming, the grip angle is too far deviated from other handguns, and the sights have a propensity to cover most of the target even at 20 feet. Nevermind that the shape of the grip is simply too bulky for people with smaller hands to comfortably wrap around it. Which isn't great for ergonomics.
Granted, I understand their popularity. Reliable, low maintenance, few controls, no manual safety, and cinematic saturation does make them a good pistol for home defense or military service, and a great handgun for new enthusiasts. Especially taking into account the vast aftermarket it has accrued. Funny to imagine that the "Glock" was the company's first foray into firearms?
From what I've found? It was too comply with a military contract. I don't understand either, because that height is not near elevated enough to peek over any suppressor or compensator that it can't already see over