smitty
I am just a very thin layer of charming with some funny sprinkles wrapped around a huge creamy center of raging arrogant a-hole.— Smitty Report User
Wow. Mind blown 3 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
That awkward moment when you change suit styles and you now have a visible tan line to work on.
3
This is what it has come to 10 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
I'm a former soldier. I support trans who serve. You got one, keep asking, you'll fine more.
Try asking the millennial generation who are serving, you might be surprised.
4
Try asking the millennial generation who are serving, you might be surprised.
I should applaud her for being such a problem-solver... But damn, it hurt my pride a lot 10 comments
This is what it has come to 10 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
How many? Do you have those numbers?
Doesn't really matter anyway though, the troops will do what they are told. When top tier leadership says to, you fucking follow.
1
Doesn't really matter anyway though, the troops will do what they are told. When top tier leadership says to, you fucking follow.
This is how the Spanish police arrest a madman with a knife (Without shooting) 20 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
That's the one.
Downvote me all you want, it won't stop the fact we're overdue a revolution.
1
·
Edited 8 years ago
Downvote me all you want, it won't stop the fact we're overdue a revolution.
Coffee for life 6 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Newly enacted distracted driving law that took effect on the 23rd of July.
Eating and drinking is classified as a secondary offense that they can cite you for if they are already pulling you over for something else.
Frankly, I don't think it will stand up in court on the grounds of infringement of civil liberties, especially given that some forms of cellular use is still permitted.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/heres-what-the-new-distracted-driving-law-means-to-you-when-it-goes-into-effect-in-july/
6
·
Edited 8 years ago
Eating and drinking is classified as a secondary offense that they can cite you for if they are already pulling you over for something else.
Frankly, I don't think it will stand up in court on the grounds of infringement of civil liberties, especially given that some forms of cellular use is still permitted.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/heres-what-the-new-distracted-driving-law-means-to-you-when-it-goes-into-effect-in-july/
This is how the Spanish police arrest a madman with a knife (Without shooting) 20 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
How about the one where they shot and killed the woman who called them in the first place?
Young and beautiful woman engaged to be married, her fiance was away in business and was scared. She was scared about noises, he told her to call the cops. They showed up and murdered her for it.
The cops are going to get away with it.
It shit like this that sparks revolutions, but we can't get enough people pissed enough to make a difference.
10
Young and beautiful woman engaged to be married, her fiance was away in business and was scared. She was scared about noises, he told her to call the cops. They showed up and murdered her for it.
The cops are going to get away with it.
It shit like this that sparks revolutions, but we can't get enough people pissed enough to make a difference.
This is what it has come to 10 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Not true.
The military already released a statement that they were going to comply with CURRENT laws until such time actual legislation saw drawn up, passed and they were given proper guidance through official channels.
You cannot dictate policy through Twitter.
I can almost guarantee that any presidential order will be immediately struck down as unconstitutional because the Supreme Court already figured that shutout with the 14th amendment two years ago.
Legislation would take longer, still be unconstitutional and probably fail anyway because a lot of republicans are turning against Trump and the party.
1
The military already released a statement that they were going to comply with CURRENT laws until such time actual legislation saw drawn up, passed and they were given proper guidance through official channels.
You cannot dictate policy through Twitter.
I can almost guarantee that any presidential order will be immediately struck down as unconstitutional because the Supreme Court already figured that shutout with the 14th amendment two years ago.
Legislation would take longer, still be unconstitutional and probably fail anyway because a lot of republicans are turning against Trump and the party.
For those of you wondering how far NKs rockets can go 26 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Besides the obvious technical difficulties they have getting their POS rockets off the ground and fly straight without breaking up, there's several more key pieces of information you MUST consiter before you bother to worry about their alleged range capabilities.
1) The rockets with the alleged range to be a "threat" do not have the payload capacity to deliver any of the nuclear devices that North Korea has.
2) Even if they did, they do not posses the targeting capability to be effectively aimed... that's right, even a "to whom it concerns" nuke.
3) They also do not have the heatshield technology for a nuclear device to survive reentry.
Don't believe the fear mongering in the media.
This is more akin to a toddler threatening you with a butterknife. Sure, it's a knife, but they have short arms, they don't know to use it and it's still only a fucking butterknife.
5
·
Edited 8 years ago
1) The rockets with the alleged range to be a "threat" do not have the payload capacity to deliver any of the nuclear devices that North Korea has.
2) Even if they did, they do not posses the targeting capability to be effectively aimed... that's right, even a "to whom it concerns" nuke.
3) They also do not have the heatshield technology for a nuclear device to survive reentry.
Don't believe the fear mongering in the media.
This is more akin to a toddler threatening you with a butterknife. Sure, it's a knife, but they have short arms, they don't know to use it and it's still only a fucking butterknife.
If I had tinder 12 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Why is that always the "joke?" It's old, it's an unimaginative trope and it shows you're a hack.
▼
A wholesome Mr. Rogers comp 10 comments
This is how the Spanish police arrest a madman with a knife (Without shooting) 20 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
The problem in the US is that the cop would face assault charges for that, but would have gotten away with shooting him.
Yup, most of our cops and the system is fucked up.
6
Yup, most of our cops and the system is fucked up.
Brightest Meteor Shower on 12 August 19 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
One bit of silver lining good news, is that Dispite the projected poor seeing the nights of 11-12 and 12-13 are Friday and Saturday night.
Find a dark sky site and take your squeeze out for a night under the stars.
I'm going to investigate this a bit more, figure out when the best times might be.
1
Find a dark sky site and take your squeeze out for a night under the stars.
I'm going to investigate this a bit more, figure out when the best times might be.
I hate those things 5 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Top tip:
Use a hand wound manual can opener to open plastic clamshell packages.
Use a hand wound manual can opener to open plastic clamshell packages.
Plastic surgery 2 comments
Is this actually legit?! 14 comments
The movie you will never see 19 comments
Is this actually legit?! 14 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Yeah? Do an image search for the Vallhund.
I'll wait.
Pretty awesome, right? Pretty much wolf corgis, but without cross breeding. They may be related having a common ancestor about 1100 to 1200 years ago.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Vallhund
7
I'll wait.
Pretty awesome, right? Pretty much wolf corgis, but without cross breeding. They may be related having a common ancestor about 1100 to 1200 years ago.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Vallhund
Is this even a question? Of course it's not! 29 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
There's some hardcore drive by downvoting going on in here.
Here's my bottom line... this is only my opinion, so take it for what you will:
If it wasn't agreed upon prior, as in to have an "open" relationship, regardless of identity or orientation, it's cheating.
However, should an interest outside the relationship be sparked outside your usual preferred identity and orientation, that may be forgivable... but it should still be talked about first.
Here's my bottom line... this is only my opinion, so take it for what you will:
If it wasn't agreed upon prior, as in to have an "open" relationship, regardless of identity or orientation, it's cheating.
However, should an interest outside the relationship be sparked outside your usual preferred identity and orientation, that may be forgivable... but it should still be talked about first.
Awesome fact about dolphins 23 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
In the wild, gangs of male dolphins have been know to seperate females from the pod, bully, physically abuse and gang rape her. Soemtimes for weeks at a time.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2009/05/13/dolphins_are_violent_predators_that_kill_their_own_babies.html.
When researching this to be sure that I wasn't in error, it turns out that male dolphins in the wild do sexually assault humans and they aren't chosy on the victim's gender either.
I'm not linking that. Sorry.
(dolphin rape is in my search history now, thanks.)
3
·
Edited 8 years ago
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2009/05/13/dolphins_are_violent_predators_that_kill_their_own_babies.html.
When researching this to be sure that I wasn't in error, it turns out that male dolphins in the wild do sexually assault humans and they aren't chosy on the victim's gender either.
I'm not linking that. Sorry.
(dolphin rape is in my search history now, thanks.)
Now that's badass! 12 comments
smitty
· 8 years ago
Except it really did happen. Russian doctor Dr. Leonid Rogozov cut out his own appendix.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32481442
11
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32481442
They broke a whole series of regulatory statutes while committing this atrocity and the municipality is being awfully quiet about it.
This happened a month ago and I did not learn that it was an immigrant that committed the murder until today. Is that supposed to make me feel any less sick to my stomach?
Are we supposed to turn a blind eye to this because it was minority on white violence?
Is that what you're saying?
Why the FUCK should that matter?
ANY violence on ANYONE needs to be felt with.