And yes, sometimes people aren't compatible, it just seems like this would be something best gotten out of the way early on. Otherwise it seems like you're genuinely just wasting everyone's time, which isn't something I'd think most people would want to do. But that's just the practical side of my brain talking. People have been known to waste years of their lives with a person they're not even remotely happy with, so a few hours isn't that big a stretch.
Either way, as you say, if the person can't deal with rejection, casual sex is almost definitely probably not going to be their cup of tea
I'm mostly just surprised this seems to be such a common theme I've seen lately, with people telling girls to stop judging guys based on their size. It's always seemed like something guys put more pressure on each over than girls, but perhaps it is women doing it more

I have to point out that I did say somewhere near the beginning of those how no one is obligated to have sex at any point. But to me this wouldn't be so different than birth control. Even in hot and heavy scenarios, most people are of enough state of mind to be able to stop and go "wait wait, do you have a condom/are you on the pill/etc etc," and if this is as big an issue for them as it seems to be where you literally can't enjoy sex with someone who lacks this specific feature, it seems to me that it would often be near the forefront of your mind anytime you get close to having sex with someone new. Much like people who are into BDSM I wouldn't think would leave it to the last second to say "by the way, I need you to choke me until I pass out so I can orgasm" (as an example)

Never thought I'd say this, but stare at her breasts/chest area, or even her shoulder. You can see the image consistently moves in one direction

If I were trying to slip it into the course of casual conversation, I'd probably say it in such a way as "sorry, I only go for guys over this many inches" blunt and to the point, or, if I were feeling Cheeky, "You have to be this big to get on MY ride," and potentiality offer an example of size with my hands. At that point it would be up to him to respond and then me to reiterate that I'm serious and what I mean

I like how you pretended you weren't going to include the tongue-in-cheek responses by giving examples of them, and thereby including them. <.<
Just to clarify I'm not trying to attack you or your friend at all, I'm literally just saying I think there's a (perhaps) better way to try and go about doing things that might save some self esteem in the long run.
-
As to your scenario, I can't really partake in the scene you've set because I lilterally would not be thinking about having sex with someone I'd only spoken to for 5 minutes. This may be an unsatisfactory response to you, but I already stated you don't have to bring it up at the beginning of the conversation. Just at some point preferably before you encourage the person out of whatever environment you started in (in this case the bar), and definitely before you've gotten them naked.

Your next couple of points are irrelevant because it's was never about whether a guy would be more willing to turn down sex. And it was never claimed breasts were as sensitive as a penis. What we were discussing was a scenario where a guy may have a very specific size he has decided he wants to deal with. His reason for this is irrelevant, it's what he's decided. Without that size breasts, like your friends with smaller penises, it's a deal breaker for him

Your first point just furthers my argument. If the men had been honest about what they wanted, or the women had been honest after deciding they were considering having sex, the women wouldn't have been wasting so much time in a relationship neither of them would ever be happy in.
You don't have to go up to every random stranger and open the dialogue with "hi, my tits are small and I only fuck guys with 7inch penises," but if you can't bring that up at even one point before you're about to let someone rub their genitals all over you, then I don't personally see how you could ever be comfortable enough to LET them do that in the first place. But, again, a lot of people can't let go of their pride or nerves enough to bring such a thing up because it's just not done

Friendly reminder that Finland is 86% forest (around 4.2 hectares per person).
Either there is no direct correlation between either of these statements, or the trees must be doing something right.

I kind of gave up understanding it awhile ago tbh haha. I always seem to annoy at least a couple people on this site-- usually when I ask questions for some reason. :)
Your Last paragraph was literally my main reason for asking. Decided I may as well poke around myself though, and so far every site I've seen seems to indicate she was, indeed, being made to stand in a segregated diner. The sources do indicate that she wasn't denied her breakfast, however-- she was waiting for a sandwich to be served to her. Not that that makes much difference
-
See? Happens every time. I mostly find it funny at this point. Someone (or someones more likely) has been offended by being presented with all of the facts, or my existence in general, and the universe is back to normal.

Are you okay? Can you tell me that you're okay?

This got very existential all of a sudden

NOW my work is done.

To me, it's no different than a guy saying to a girl "I only fuck girls with size D breasts."
Maybe she's wearing a baggy coat, or a push-up bra, so he can't tell right away. If she knows or at least has an idea that she's not size D, or if she even suspects she might not be big enough-- OR too big-- or that the guy maybe isn't someone she's down for sleeping with after all, she can now back out of it and find someone more worth her time, and the guy can as well. If she goes through with it anyway, it's now knowing full well she might not be what the guy is expecting.
The alternative is waiting until he has her naked, looking at her chest and then telling her "that's not good enough," and then, apparently maybe offering oral as a consolation prize. At that point the damage is already done, and maybe it won't be the least awkward conversation of your life, but if you CAN avoid fucking up someone's self esteem to that degree, it seems worth the effort to at least try.

Doesn't seem that difficult. If you can tell someone you want them to rub their genitals inside your own until you're both covered in each others bodily fluids, saying "you should know, I only fuck guys with penises at least this big" hardly seems a stretch. A visual demonstration may even be in order. Also, why would that even remotely be the first thing you say to them? Unless you see someone and know instantly that you are going to fuck them, and that they will consent to fucking you, using that as your opening line would be ridiculous. I merely said it should be brought up at some point BEFORE you've gotten the guy naked. Maybe he'll want to go ahead and risk it anyway, but at least you've given him the opportunity to back off, and I see no reason why that's an unreasonable thing to do. I understand a lot of people *won't* either because they won't think to do it, or they can't bring themselves to swallow their own pride/nerves

Aren't they working on fucking up the little mermaid right now? Or did they already do that?
Also - seconding the sentiment about Aladdin, and throw the Lion King in there as well. I'm pretty sure the lion king is still one of their top 5 highest ranked movies of all time

The other girl is taller than him, too

Sometimes the scenic route makes the more enjoyable points

I've never heard of Egyptian ratscrew before, but if I had, based on it's name, I'd have never guessed it had to do with a card game

Well, at least someone does. Someone else's night got ruined by that somehow, and yet my work doesn't feel quite done. So here is an actual recipe to make something similar to the cake above:
http://www.geekychef.com/2010/09/delicious-and-moist-cake.html?m=0
-
This cake is not a lie

I took an art class in school, and we were working on painting. We had to pick and/or design what we were going to paint. I had no clue what to paint so I asked for suggestions, and my mom suggested I paint an Acacia tree. So I thought, okay, sure, why not.
Went to the class ready to get started, and I remember asking the teacher for advice on color mixing or something. Next thing I know he won't stop asking me "but WHY are you painting the tree? what does the tree MEAN to you?"
I legitimately had no answer to that, since I figured "it doesn't mean anything to me, it just looks nice, so I thought I'd give it a try," wouldn't go over all that well

Don't forget garnishes such as:
Fish-shaped crackers
Fish-shaped candies
Fish-shaped solid waste
Fish-shaped dirt
Fish-shaped ethylbenzene
Pull-and-peel licorice
Fish-shaped volatile organic compounds and sediment-shaped sediment
Candy-coated peanut butter pieces (shaped like fish)
1 cup lemon juice
Alpha resins
Unsaturated polyester resin
Fiberglass surface resins and volatile malted milk impoundments
9 large egg yolks
12 medium geosynthetic membranes
1 cup granulated sugar
An entry called: "How to Kill Someone with Your Bare Hands"
2 cups rhubarb, sliced
2/3 cups granulated rhubarb
1 tbsp. all-purpose rhubarb
1 tsp. grated orange rhubarb
3 tbsp. rhubarb, on fire
1 large rhubarb
1 cross borehole electromagnetic imaging rhubarb
2 tbsp. rhubarb juice
Adjustable aluminum head positioner
Slaughter electric needle injector
Cordless electric needle injector
Injector needle driver
Injector needle gun
Cranial caps