Failure just likes to be a pompous ignorant ass. It's his only skillset.

Castillo has literally no relevance to Rittenhouse. A mass shooting and a self defense shooting have nothing in common other then a firearm.

@iccarus Hold the damn phone. You've said repeatedly that Rittenhouse bringing a rifle into the riot incited the violence but then you ask where his backup is? The guy's who'd have guns? "You say he went there to help, but alone, where was his support, back up when he was being chased, they go home? gave up?"
So the solution to a single armed individual who's inciting violence by being armed is to bring mooore people who are armed? Duuude. Listeeenn too yoursellllf. This is painful. Your logic does not connect in any way. You are literally arguing against common sense things. Once again, if a cop goes into a dangerous situation unarmed does that make him smart or dead? I'll save you the trouble. It's dead. The same for Rittenhouse. There is no difference in the scenario.

If you read it different, an idiot attacked an armed individual not knowing what happened only that the individual had a rifle and was willing to use it.

Sounds like it did rip his foot.

Excuuuuse me.
He could have loaded that rifle with pie. You don't know that rifles life.

@iccarus This is embarassing to read. Your eagerness to shift the blame on an individual for carrying a rifle rather then three individuals who attacked someone without cause is astounding. I've met a few confused people and you're near the top of the list. Your logic has no definable path. You just leap from one thing to another. If you want a productive conversation I suggest you start by looking at your own thought process and addressing the massive gaps and logical fallacies.

It doesn't matter if the judge makes up his mind on guilty or innocent. The jury makes the decision on the verdict. The judge just decides the sentencing.
What's this about vets? I don't follow.

Yet Rosenbaum's decision to attack him is immaterial? You're the least consistent person I've ever met. Try contemplating why you're villifying someone who defended their own life and maybe contemplate why it's okay for you to defend yourself but Kyle Rittenhouse can't.

Your assistance, as always, is appreciated and invaluable.

This clearly isn't going anywhere. You refuse to acknowledge my questions or statements and you keep bringing up the same illogical point. Enjoy ringing your bell.

No he'd just have been dead. I don't know if that's considered a victim in your mind but it is in mine.

A rifle invites confrontation.....Are you serious? Did you really just say that? So if you saw a cop walking down the street you'd attack him because he's armed? What kind of logic is that? "Hmm that guy is carrying a gun. I better smack him with a shoe." Nevermind that he's a cop or a bodyguard or security for the embassy.

To live in a land where carrying a rifle safely is just a misdemeanor and not a 10 year sentencing.

Can I be you when I grow younger?

The urge to defend oneself is evidence that the individual shouldn't be allowed to live apparently.

Did you even watch the videos? He didn't confront anyone. He was attacked without provocation. That is blatantly obvious. I have no idea why you are so against Kyle considering he was assaulted by multiple people. Xvarnah making the comparison to blaming the rape victim is completely accurate.

That's either a threat or a plead for mercy.

Yes. Intent to protect businesses that had been attacked already for no reason other then that there was a RIOT. If you have any proof he went there with "intent" then by all means. So far it seems like you just want to demonize a 17 year old boy because he refused to allow someone to attack him without provocation.

It's a joke referencing a very intelligent politician. I should have left more context.

I hope next Remembrance Day is better. My town didn't do a public event this time. I miss those.