If you find the Make/Model, you would usually have a suspect by that point. Check the National Database if they have that gun, Seize it and send it to ballistics.
I think soldiers would follow orders given. Failure to do so would get them shot.
I think the crazies in the US are the lot of you, As you seem to think Donald Trump is a political candidate.

Find my iPhone was originally made to find a lost or stolen phone. The Pinging feature if for when it is lost at home

@ronnyd I will just put in
No, I am not trolling. You can, and Australian Police regularly do, trace a bullet from the markings it leaves. Both on the casing and on the projectile.
The military would side with the people that pay them the most, and the government has a lot of money, last I checked. I agree with that.
Australia doesn't have Marmite, and Vegemite can't kill, unless suddenly everyone had a severe anaphylactic reaction. Not likely. Or possible.
If you remove guns, You remove the nuts from getting guns. Remove supply, and the Insane peoples don't get guns. Make sense?
This is my OPINION of the issue. If you disagree fine, But I base this on fact, Not Prejudice.
Thanks,
@benelenium

If what they want to do is kill you, then ballistics will find the gun and the murderer will be charged. If you pull a gun, and they already have, you WILL be shot. The police deal with gun crime. Less guns mean the Supply & Demand scale reverses. Less guns, Less gun crime. If you don't understand that, clearly there is something wrong with you, explaining your issues wrapping your head around my logic.

Under 1mb/s in a capital city?

Yes, But if she pulls the gun out, she gets shot before she can shoot unless she is the flash

She gets mugged and calls the police. Gives a description. If she gets shot they can trace ballistics

Yes it is. That s a great reason. See, in that case, Do any other civs get shot?

EYY!

And as I said, there are more than 1 guy as security. So not all of them are in one place. And they are accustomed to the surroundings.

How is that under my logic? There are more than 1 guy as security. If a gunshot is heard, they would stop anyone from getting in

Or if the Security took all guns on entry, he wouldn't have got in. If he forced his way in, the security have guns

Yes, but if he sees you go for your gun, or even sees your gun, who gets shot first?

Yes. When it took enough time to make friends with the shooter.
If there are significantly less guns, what will they attack you with? If they have a gun, Let them do what they want, and call the police. you should have a description. If you have a gun you have to go get it, load it, turn off the safety and lift to fire. At that point, they would have shot you. So what does that achieve. I would rather have no gun and not be shot.

Why do you get to decide when they are tyrannical. Why is the your choice. My answer is No. That is not a good reason. Why would you need to overthrow them. How will you overthrow them. Why haven't you already?

And Australia, Taking 2 days to receive the news, because our internet is too slow for emails.

And WWII, In Kokoda, 10 to 1 odds, And Vietnam at the Battle of Long Tan. We did well

Yes, But that did happen here. There was cash reward for guns handed in. Only the government (and those with valid reason) have guns and we are fine. Our police can't shoot for shit in the dark (google fatalities of the lindt siege) and almost never shoot people (armed is the exception, where they are asked 5 times to lower the weapon, non-compliance means 3 shots to the legs), but we have a good enough government and no mass shootings.

And thats why aussies exist. When a colony does better than the motherland.

No, *cough* never seen that before *cough cough*

When two celestial bodies love each other very much... (continue the story, lets see where this goes)