Well, they are finally branching out in the genepool.

He was once THE heartthrob, think Bieber, but not trash.

This isn't really just the royal family, its the wedding party. Those, and the ones on the otherside, are her flower girl and pageboys, probably extending family or friends

Only thing I can derive from her comment is she doesn't have any furniture.

Okay, I was misinformed one that one because I'm not really involved. That in no way changes, or has anything to do with the gun ownership/access facts. It's apples and oranges. One is a state reversing a federal law, the other is a state defining a federal law. States have autonomy in that, it was why we had the civil war.

Yes, I'm in America, but in the interest of full honesty, this was about 15 years ago.

Thank you for doing the research and correcting the mistruth. Just because they didn't die in no way lessens the courage it took or the measure of them. I don't know why so many people feel they need to gild the lilly to make hero stories have a tragic ending

Home Ec was basically how to take care of your home, we had cooking, meal planning, budgeting and basic sewing skills, among other things.

No, it has more to do with not risking fraud, as well as customer privacy because while it is legal there is still a stigma. The dispensaries in NV aren't cash only.

It would have the same outcome either way if I tried.

Definitely

Any neighborhood or apartment complex would demand it be put down. But small dogs they just shrug off

Not necessarily because states have autonomy, just as some states have legalized marijuana and prostitution. It depends on the specific strictures by state, such as what the legal age is per state. A federal law is more like an outline and states determine the specifics of what defines that law.

I'm with @frostbite. My guess is she's cheating and didn't want to be seen with the guts arm around her.

I specifically said they had to have parents permission and the parents had to give signed consent. How does that differ from what you just said? The point being that a 17 year old can own a firearm. And, returning to the original point of this thread, parents aren't culpable for keeping guns away from a 17 year old. That law is specifically for anyone younger that 17.

Its in the second Magnus Chase book.

Did you read the article you posted?
"Minors may also purchase weapons if they can provide for written permission by their parent or legal guardian." Its right there.
FYI, my brother is a federal attorney, that's where I get my information from.

This most recent one actually said he didn't it because he wanted to be famous. Thankfully he was inept and didn't know what he was doing while making the bombs or it could have been much worse

No, he doesn't. He wanted fame and now he has it. He's shown no remorse

Obviously you are the one uninformed. Read up on the laws in Texas.
FYI, concealed carry/carrying a gun isn't the same as purchasing a gun. It is also dependent on the type of gun.

I think that is the worst level of selfish, forcing a pet, or worse baby, into a diet that cannot sustain them just so the owner/parent cam feel self righteous.

Again I say, legally he could have access to the gun because he is 17. Hell, he could have bought one himself with a note from his parents. One of the main reasons for having guns in a home is self defense, so why wouldn't you tell your LEGAL AGE son how to get the gun in case of an emergency? But AGAIN, we don't know the circumstances in the home, we don't how he got the guns or how they were secured.

Unfortunately it can be a sign of a much more disturbing condition where they will begin CAUSING the symptoms/illnesses because they are addicted to the attention.

Are you being intentionally obtuse? A) I didn't say his parents weren't at fault, at least partially. B) I also didn't say they gave him the combo, I just disputed that bad to be some kind of cat burglar to gain access. He could have easily figured it out in a number of ways, not the least of which is if he'd just watched his father open it. Teenagers are idiots, they tend to be incredibly resourceful when they want to. And no, that isn't a sign of a shitty parent. The guy was 17 years old, almost a legal adult. Also, just in case you are unaware, in Texas 17 isn't considered a minor when it comes to having access to guns. That doesn't mean they can own them, but parents aren't necessarily liable for them getting ahold of one in the home.