Actually, yes, you very much could in that time. It was expected. Now, admittedly, I believe it was more expected for them to go to the servants entrance for help, but still. Also, what people keep missing is that is how long the curse lasted, no aged, time stopped at the castle. She didn't curse a damn kid, that was made obvious by the painting of him as a grown man that he shredded.

Like I said, if they ask not to, don't. But seriously, if you have such an issue with someone wearing your shirt, you shouldn't be in a relationship, you need to be working on you. Now, I'm not taking about a casual relationship, I'm assuming if you are at the clothing sharing stage you are living together. And if you can't handle having the person you are living with romantically wearing your shirt, you are not in the head space to be sharing a life together. Its as simple as that. The only time I wore my exs clothes was when I was pregnant and girls clothes sucked. If he'd had a problem with me borrowing his shirts, sure, I would have stopped, but he didn't complain, because he was a grown ass adult in a committed relationship. Seriously. If clothing sharing is a big issue, or really ANY issue in your relationship, just call it now, save everyone some time.

That's the problem with these bs micro news memes. They take a snippet of a paragraph and make it seem like the entire novel was skewed one way or another.

Unfortunately there's not enough military to do that patrolling. And if civvies don't do something soon we are going to be looking at a world without a lot species. Which laws here have precedent? Why are the refueling more important than stopping the whaling? The whaler had enough fuel to get home, just not to continue hunting, which was the point. They made it back safe, despite ramming the Barker, and I believe the Steve Irwin.

And hunting endangered/protected species os illegal

Okay, look I don't know if you are intentionally being an ignorant ass, or just missing the point. I'm not saying that baby is abusing the animal, I'm saying the asshole adult taking the photo rather than stopping the child is. The child doesn't understand, that is the adult's job to teach it. If the adult doesn't and the child ends up hurting an animal and that animal hurts or kills that child in self defense, it's not that animals fault, it's the adult and to a much lesser extent the child (obviously depending on age)

The Barker didn't instigate a collision, they got in the way, like playing monkey in the middle but not. The Maru did infact attempt repeatedly to ram the Barker in retaliation though.

Its not debatable. It is illegal to whale in international waters, simple as that. And as for sinking the Barker, wow, so they so risk killing hundred of crew because they are preventing them from continuing their illegal trade. You definitely sound like you have a bright future ahead of you in any organized crime syndicate. But guess what, that exactly what they tried to do, despite the Barker not trying to ram them, or make any contact, simply getting in the way. The whaler repeated rammed them. Not that it did any good. Btw, the Bob Barker's sister ship is the Steve Irwin, which they also targeted for sinking and failed at.

Bob Barker is a big supporter of the conservationists and funds a lot of their efforts, so yes, they have named a ship after him.

That was my first thought. My short term memory is basically mush, so I would end up constantly smacking into this and giving myself a concussion, which would only exacerbate the memory problems

Possibly a ragdoll, but its big, even for a ragdoll

They are illegally whaling in international waters. That's the point. They have been repeatedly told to stop by the UN but they don't care because they feel it's their right because of "tradition".

What are you talking about, he shows up every where, except for his family

If it is potentially causing internal damage or broken bones thats abuse, pretty simple.

What else would you call stomping on an animal's stomach?

If you leave your kid alone in a stranger's car you are a shit parent. But also, unattended children are also against uber policy

But even he questions which he really is, Clark trying to be better as Superman or Superman pretending to be flawed as Clark. It's the reason its hard to find a really good actor for Superman because they have to be convincing as BOTH Clark and Superman, not one or the other.

Good luck with that, this has been floating around for years.