Even Gwendoline Christie (Brienne) said she feel that now he haa a REAL chance to win her (I guess despite the whole living on opposite ends of the continent thing)

Considering that in this particular campaign they literally never got a chance to even fight before being obliterated, on or off screen is rather irrelevant.

Seriously, breath hun, don't let the idiots give you arthritis or carpal tunnel. Obviously SOMEONE didn't actually think before responding to you, because it was obvious you were referring to the ignorance you are arguing against as the cause for your lengthy responses, not to every reader (admittedly that could be because I'm familiar with your stance and comments but I felt it was clear).
But, honestly, try not to get too worked up, there are a ton of people online who spew ignorance and hate just to rile people up. They are trolls and don't deserve any attention.

Absolutely, more voices of reason and sense.
Also, we can now add Missouri to the states which actively REFUSED to allow an exemption for victims in their ban. YAY land of freedom, unless you have a vagina.

Omg, seriously, my Uncle Charles had a D.O.G. when I was a kid. I was both impressed and disappointed in his naming skills.

You mean the military that left with him? And as mentioned, he had just instigated a wholesale slaughter of pretty much an entire city AFTER they had laid down arms and surrendered. This was after he and his queen had vowed multiple times that if the bells wrung they would honor the surrender. That's pretty much war crimes right there. Not to mention Hilter...ahem Dany's rallying speech where she promised to go slaughtering the rest of the known world...for their own good of course. The entire trial concept was ludicrous and poorly contrived.

I may have to give it a try before my subscription ends

Television as a rule IS episodic, except those produced by premium cable channels which is SERIAL, though you've managed to comment on a post about one of the few that actually ISN'T episodic, its a miniseries, so its not really either.

I'm the SAME way. Due to my neurological issues I have to rely on spellcheck and still focus stupid hard to make sure I didn't screw up. Fun fact: I had to back track about 10 times just in that sentence. I just can't do with letting typos ect go either, unless In having an especially bad spell

I think it also bares mentioning that Hebrew/Jewish bloodlines are tracked through the maternal line more than the paternal (which is why both Joseph AND Mary's lineage is documented for Jesus). But I believe that is more from practicality, the old "mama's baby, daddy's maybe" mentality

I think we were commenting simultaneously.

I will suggest an amendment, they aren't included in MODERN or popular theology because the Church is notoriously prejudiced against women. Example: Mary Magdalene being turned into a prostitute despite their being no historical evidence or suggestion of any such thing. Or that, at least in Catholic doctrine, Mary (the Mother) remained a virgin forever, despite being married and only having a single child (there are multiple levels of insulting in this aspect of the belief), just because they are so horrified at the concept of sex they couldn't consider her saintly if she dared to actually have sex.
I will also mention, we know those women's names because they either accomplished huge feats or were involved in larger narratives. Meanwhile we know the names and lineages going back 20 generations for every random merchant Abraham passed (admittedly a slight exaggeration), yet not the name of "the woman at the well".

Because that's the PURPOSE of the EDUCATION system. And if you don't want a bunch of teenagers getting pregnant because they don't understand the basic concepts such as you CAN get pregnant your first time, on your period, even if he pulls out, then SOMEONE needs to educate them and way too often that doesn't happen at home.

Thanks, I could make out the cat, but not the bedroll.

I totally agree that whoever doesn't have custody should have to pay whoever does. I honestly didn't see your comment. It doesn't matter who has custody, unless it is some kind of agreement beforehand that the mother is basically just a surrogate or the father a sperm donor, both should provide for the child.