Caffeine still has SOME effect on me, unlike adderall and I've been using caffeine WAY longer.

Oh get off ut bethorien. I simply have a grasp of reality, unlike you, and choose when to walk away. I'm not silencing anyone, I'm just tired of this same thing being posted over and over just to stir the shitpot. Seriously, this site is just going to hell because of trolls and bots.

They can verify paternity inutero. But the restrictions usually does more damage than aid. I had a friend who had left her abusive ex, had faught for a divorce over a year, she was with an awesome guy and just found out she was pregnant. The OBs office royally fucked up and left a message referring specifically to her and scheduling a sonogram at her former address (the one her almost ex husband still lived at), I will add this was a HUGE nono, privacy wise. Anyway as soon as her ex found out he of course used it to fuck with her, informing the judge and claiming it was his ect. Regardless of the fact they verified DNA in the womb, it didn't matter to the courts.

Still, this is the winner.

Breath sweetie, your fingers are going to cramp if you keep this up. :)

Exactly.

But it IS a well known potential byproduct, just saying. And seriously, where do people come by this notion that all men are pro life?

@interesting I don't doubt you aren't the downvoter, there are a ton on troll on this site lately. I'm seriously NOT debating this AGAIN, this easily the 5th or 6th time in a month this crap has been on here and its been covered 7 ways to Sunday. I will state, in this case, if he is so concerned about having to pay, HE should be the one to avoid any potential chance. If the OP was female I would have said the same to her.

That's not really the case, at least not any more. Its just the hospital doesn't automatically list the father's name if the mother is unmarried. A father can, and has in many cases, sued for parental rights without being on the birth certificate let alone married to the mother. The REAL "fun" laws are like the one in Texas where you cannot get a divorce if you are pregnant, even if you started proceeding well before you got pregnant and your estranged spouse ISN'T THE FATHER. It doesn't matter. They could be in the final stages of a 2 year divorce but if the court finds out she is even 2 months pregnant, the divorce is stalled until she gives birth

But its TOLKIEN.

I SERIOUSLY would not doubt it. But it's likely expensive as HELL.

Yes. But they become less effective the longer they are taken.

I must be confusing details. Stupid brain.

The Hobbit can certainly be considered far more a children's book than The Lord of the Rings, but it isn't exclusively for children, which is what is implied. It was more of an introductory book for the LotR world which he was already working on but not nearly finished with (which is why there were a number of edits made between the first and second printings). But to say "then write a children's book in it" is a vast over simplification of not only the work but the weight of the world created there, to the point of being vaguely insulting to all.

The parents would be assumed to have made the purchase, thus the item is their property.
Now, obviously this varies dramatically by the age and individual circumstances of the minor in question. Obviously the same stipulations would not be as overtly one sided for a 16 year old as a 7 year old. But given the mother is having to clean the son's room, I'm assuming he's either not old enough or he's so damned lazy he's not to be trusted. That's assuming this is real rather than just another "and every one clapped" fantasies written by an entitled child.

No court of law would uphold a child's right to "privacy" from a parent, its part of being a GUARDIAN to know what your child is involved in. On top of that, if a child had a "right to property" then a child taken into state custody would not be forced to leave most of their belongings behind, unless of course you are suggesting the state then be charged with loss of said property. The basic fact is, aside from the much broader and obviously more crucial, human rights, minors DO NOT have the same rights, just as they cannot legally own property, cars or purchase alcohol and tobacco until a specific age. As far as taking property away, the child would have to prove ownership (possession doesn't matter), and that they purchased the item(s) with their own money (something also not easily proven since minors under a specific age can't legally work). Cases like this are based in the most likely situation, without documented evidence to the contrary, and the most likely ca see e would be

I read somewhere (ages ago so I have no clue the context) that you need to wear protective gear when harvesting mangos because they are caustic and can cause burn. Is that actually a thing or have I gotten stuff muddled in my memory

EXACTLY. I honestly think a lot of people confuse him and C.S. Lewis.

But they only last a few minutes, and if you cut it off you still have to deal with phantom limb pain

My mom was chased by a hammerhead in Galveston (back in the early 60s). It actually tried to go over the sandbar, but looking back she realized it was probably just chasing them to chase them because, honestly, if it had wanted to catch them it could have