contrary to what you implied before
You keep mentioning research you've done, I'd love to see your sources, not only for the sake of my argument, but if you're truly right I'd like to know.
Here are my sources:
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/should-not-vacc.htm
http://www.vaccinestoday.eu/vaccines/the-choice-not-to-vaccinate-doesnt-only-affect-you/
http://www.vaccineinformation.org/vaccines-save-lives/
http://www.immunizeforgood.com/fact-or-fiction/benefits-vs.-risks
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/patient-ed/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf

It is worth noting, however, that there are some people (not newborns) who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons. Some people's bodies react so poorly to vaccines that they can have seizures. It's not just newborns, it's everyday people as well you, in theory, need to be careful of, but of course its impossible to spot these people in everyday life. You mentioned some research that you did, and I'd love to see it, but some of the statements you've made are not well founded. For example, what you said about doctors shooting up babies with vaccines without letting their bodies build the immune systems on their own? Most vaccines are supplementary to the immune system building on its own. Antibodies of the virus are injected into the bloodstream so the immune system can later recognize the virus and fight it more efficiently to prevent the host from getting sick/dying. There is no "con" to vaccines in respect to the immune system, it is not weaker, but stronger because of the vaccine;

she changed it before she was cast if I remember correctly

who didn't try to breathe and swallow at the same time?

That sounds almost deadly... or maybe
DADLY

well I'm Aquarius and I'm Hella weird (with a capital H) but I don't judge

maybe they could have reinforced the bridge?

I think they did that to make the gif fit better actually

plans than the left. There is one documented case when a man goes to hug his wife with one hand, only to find that his other hand had an entirely different agenda. RIGHT HOOK TO THE FACE BITCH. one woman would pick one dress, only to have her other hand choose a different outfit. Another man had trouble sleeping at night because he was worried his rebellious hand might strangle him. Reply if you would like more explanation on this, but I think I've left enough to read. Also in my first reply, I meant that one kind of thinking ISNT solely confined to one part of the brain, both have qualities that would seem opposite themselves. Much of my information comes from Dr. Michio Kaku author of the book "The future of the mind"I hope this helped!

"feedback loops" of communication going awry. It's like a microphone screeching in your ear. Dr. Sperry began by severing the Corpus Callosum which is what links the two hemispheres and allows them to communicate. This stopped the seizures.
Then something strange happened:
at first the split brain patients seemed perfectly normal. They were alert and could carry on conversation as if nothing happened. A careful analysis proved otherwise. "Normally the two hemispheres compliment each other as thoughts move back and forth between the two. The left is more analytical and logical, the right is more holistic and artistic. But the left brain is the dominant one and makes the final decisions. We now know that commands pass from the left brain to the right via the corpus callosum, but once the connection is cut, the right brain is free from the dictatorship of the left. It causes two wills acting in one skull, and the part of the body controlled by the right brain, was often up to other

It's true that our sources are contradictory. Allow me to clear some things up.
It's true (and stated in your article) that one kind of thinking is solely confined to one side of the brain. Here is the split brain paradox:
Our brains work by communicating with different parts of themselves. It's true that we use our entire brains equally, which you stated up there. The difference is that our left brain is in charge. Back to communication: A split brain patient is someone with a brain in which the two hemispheres can't communicate with each other. If our brains were equally dominant. Then the right brain could do what it chooses and the left would do what it decides. Dr. Roger Sperry of the California Institute of Technology won the nobel prize in 1981 for proving that the two hemispheres are not exact carbon copies of each other, but actually perform different functions. Dr. Sperry was treating epileptics, who often suffer from grand mal seizures. These seizures are often caused by

In many cases, the suicide wasn't long planned. In the heat of a moment, someone just snapped. Its just so easy and simple to use a gun. Psychologists estimate that if people have more restricted access to guns, suicide rates would go down 30% in the U.S alone.