Comments

As Richard Dawkins put it: you can start equating religion and science once somebody finds the face of Christopher Hitchen burned on a slice of toast and people start worshipping it. A concept of god is not needed to explain what there is for us to explain. Anybody believing in a creator or creation just stops inquiring when it comes to the question who/what created the creator, so this is just meaningless.

God and science is like tea and coffee? I can't understand how anybody would say anything as random and meaningless as this, unless he had no idea of what science is at all. The concept of any kind of religion is some guy making something up to explain phenomenons and telling you to believe it. If you do, you're on his side, if not, you're a heretic at best and normally his enemy. What he says cannot be verified nor falsified. A scientist would set up a theory and explain how he came to it. He would use standard rules and procedures, to enable anybody who knows these rules to reproduce his results OR falsify his theory. So he would basically ask the scientific community to prove him wrong by any means (peer review).

Dude, if you knew what you were missing, you would get really depressed.

Ok, fine. Just what does it matter? Only a complete dope would insist on carrying a fucking swastika anywher