Comments

I understand that, sir/ma'am. However, one can only assert something as fact if such an assertion has the evidence to support it. After doing research, this claim has barely anything substantial, therefore it cannot be regarded as fact. I do not dismiss the possibility of the claim; I dismiss its concrete assertion.

In a word: reproduction. There are dozens of other trends as well, relating to genetics, skills and even social preferences. There are distinct differences between the male and female brain (Google it). Neither is superior, and both are remarkably similar (because they are the same species, of course), but both are different.

Years old? Kilograms? Inches tall? Boasting points? "Thinks someone gives a shit" degrees?

I agree, but glasses can be attractive, too. Though obviously not related to IQ in any way, they do give a sense of class and intellect. You just need to have the mind and confidence to pull it off.

Pointing out potential logical fallacies makes me an "asshole"? I'll be sure to take my critical thinking somewhere else as I don't want your precious feelings to be hurt. At least one of us left without calling names.
And UnderYourBed, that is simply a difference in motivation. Both are essentially distress brought about by involuntary circumstance. To assume one dislikes being in a generation because of a superiority complex is quite judgmental for a person who sympathises towards those with gender dysphoria. Uncomfortable with generation? Snob. Uncomfortable with sex? Victim of circumstance.

You don't choose which biological sex you're born into, so you may as well embrace it.
Oh, whoops. Do I smell a double standard?

Yes, guest. Learn to take a joke! Those who can't take a joke are retarded.
(Waits for the irony to arrive.)

I can fix that.
Wololo.