Comments

I am addressing the other guest, I also respectfully disagree with your assertion. Especially in the Evolutionary theory department. That particular theory has so many holes and inconsistencies in it that it really should not be taught. Marginal research will show the myriad of logical flaws in that theory and the only reason I can logically think that it is still being taught is that it is being propped up by people who are at the very least intellectually dishonest. That is part of the issue I have with the whole "scientific theory" story. A lot of theories that should have been thrown out ages ago keep on existing because of peoples agendas. If we are going to have scientific research let us have pure research without the emotional involvement.

darkanhell, I respectfully disagree. If a hypothesis has been proven then it is done, if it can change with new data then it is not fact. Example , and I know this is simplistic, at one time the prevailing theory was that if you eat eggs then your cholesterol goes up and you die earlier, but now the theory is eggs aren't as bad. Theory is a fancy word the scientific community uses for "I'm guessing". Whereas a law such as the law of gravity is just that a law, a fact. It cannot change. It is in effect 100% of the time and it does not matter how much data is collected it is still the same.

No,no,no!! It is Quantum Theory!! The Evolutionary theory!! Theory is a theory, it is something postulated but not proven. That is why it is called the LAW of gravity not the theory of gravity.

That is a fairly accurate representation of the 1895 Nagant revolver.