Comments

To answer the common question here: milk is white, but it's more symbolic. Milk is highly nutritient dense and one of the cheapest sources of complete protein available. As such those without access to milk or ability to digest it (non whites are more prone to lactose intolerance and tend to use less milk and dairy in traditional cuisine), either need to gather larger quantities of other foods or buy more expensive foods with similar nutrient density to get the same nutrition. This is a disadvantage. Some go as far to see all livestock as a form of slavery and the "white agenda" of subjugating other beings to gain advantage. In other words, they see milk as an example of white privilege, that even if some can't or won't take it, to most whites life presents an "easy opportunity" to thrive that other races don't get or can't enjoy. I do not agree in this case but have presented the common logic to better explain the view point.