Comments

Misrepresented claim, at best; could be as much as outright lying.
Species was reclassified in recent years to be 'possibly endangered', due to upswing in numbers (as were ABLE to be counted).

It astonishes me that no commenters here (so far, anyway) cannot recognize this as being at least ONE of satire, parody, irony, caricature maybe, lampooning certainly, as well as mockery, ridicule, and derision for sure. And yes, bigtime trolling. And I guess a shipload of other terms describing contemptuous dismissal of the subjects of this remarkably stupid "community" of so-called anti-vaxxers?
Really, what is *wrong* with some of you? Do you not get *taught* the elements of the english language in school?
Of COURSE it's trolling; the goal, it appears, is to make 'anti-vaxxers' appear to be incredibly stupid, anti-science, morons. Of course, they are that, but this is a case of having a little fun with the dumb f**kers.

THIS pix is an illustration of just one of they many reasons WHY so-called "catastrophic anthropogenic global warming" is a complete crock of shit.
(Hint for those bright enough to research it: that tropical thunderhead is removing - upward to the edge of the atmosphere - a *significant* amount of the heat energy that the Sun laid down in that local area earlier in the day)

Shame that Burger King can't spell, or knows how and when to use an apostrophe.

boring as batshit

Funny how this artist's conception of homo erectus ergaster looks a lot like today's Australian Aborigines ... just sayin' ...

Nice illustrating the twisted individuals who buy, promote breeding, and keep dogs of artificial morphism just guaranteeing the poor bloody dog a life of physical problems and medical costs.

She's half-right: sure solar-electric panels work a bit better at lower temperatures. Problem is, where's the light, when it's snowy and overcast and - shock, horror! - NIGHT? Where's the quantity of panels needed to provide enough BASELOAD electricity to run a 21st-century city - especially when it's cold? What about the coal, oil, or gas power station that needs to be CONSTANTLY spinning idle (wasting fuel) to be able to very quickly ramp up to take up the load and maintain the power supply when that miserable contribution from solar (and wind, even more so) suddenly collapses due to weather variations?
So fizzy, yes, kinda glad that constant, regular, stable, baseload electricity is provided, and not incremental, unreliable, highly variable, EXPENSIVE, and intermittent "renewable" electricity.
And yes, "Occasional Cortex" IS a nitwit socialist, if she believes renewables will cut it.