Comments

That sounds like shitty etiquette, you probably shouldn't follow it.

They're not anti-anything, they're pro-white. That's what being a white supremacist is.

What do you have against labels mgoveia? Black people are black and white people are white. It is a fact that they're different races. There's no point in outright ignoring facts.
And I'm not sephoria, but where do you gut off assuming someone hasn't earned anything in life based solely on the fact that they're proud of their race?

Brilliant argument, sir.

Odd, considering the KKK isn't anti-minority, but pro-white...

Football, Martial Arts, Hunting...

Yes, yes it is.

Police brutality is never supposed to be a part of policing. Shitty neighborhoods are not the cause of police brutality, shitty police officers are. Whether its from lax training or bad character or whatever, officers are responsible for their own behavior.
I do understand that if there was less violence in general there would be less incidents of officers being overly violent, but that doesn't really solve the problem, it just makes it irrelevant (hypothetically).

Yeah I see this a lot too, and I'm pretty much as white as you can get. I wouldn't say fuck them, but it would certainly be silly to apologize for acting outside your own stereotype.

Exactly. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging race (or skin color), it's only bad if you connect stereotypes to it.

Patrolling a violent neighborhood doesn't justify police brutality. It's unacceptable anywhere that it happens, so we can't blame particular neighborhoods for it.

Real Jews are all Hebrew, as Jews are said to be the Chosen People, so converts are just fake Jews, as their bloodline is not of the Chosen People.
And I suppose you can argue semantics if you want, but it is well know that the word "Hebrew" is used to identify Semitic Israelis, i.e. the chosen people since ancient times.

I don't know, I think it's an awfully large leap going from "stop talking about it" to "stop using the term so lightly". Maybe, but I find it dubious.
Also, highlighting one race isn't racist, in order for it to be racist it would have to suggest that one race is superior.
Either way Morgan's still wrong, as using "racist" more responsibly won't, in itself, solve racism.

That's definitely a problem, but that doesn't mean the solution is to stop talking about racism in general.
Racist ideals and opinions won't just go away if non-racist people stop talking about them.

Exactly. Not talking about murder doesn't stop murder, so why would not talking about racism stop racism?

They're not. Hebrews are descended form middle-eastern nations.

Indeed. And we also have things like the Doppler Effect, where the sound of an object can be subjective depending on your position compared to it relative to time. Not that that directly relates to whether there actually was sound or not.

But they're not professional chefs. With a few exceptions all the contestants on Master Chef are home cooks.

What joke? Everyone including the title is ragging on Larry, who did nothing wrong. Where's the joke?

What type? It addresses a question that science either can't or has yet to answer, i.e. the nature of the persistence of causality.

What? Assuming what Larry said was true it would be Kooshball's own fault if he got fired. Don't pin this on Larry.

You guys are missing the point. It a philosophical question, not a scientific one. It's meant to question the validity of the assumption of a persistent causality.
Essentially it questions the assumption that the world that is as it is perceived is derived from a world that "is as it is".
The question itself is unanswerable because if no one/nothing is there to experience the tree falling it's impossible to conclusively prove that it made a sound.

The math is all there in the comment on the first post.

The brain is not a muscle. Can't be paralyzed.

The logic of the company not making the money is flawed in two ways.
Firstly, not getting something is not the same as having something stolen from you. No one stole that money.
Secondly, this logic makes the assumption that anyone who pirates something would buy it legitimately if piracy wasn't an option. Something that is far from realistic.

Except it's not that obvious, because many people will judge you and belittle you for hitting a woman regardless of the reason why you did it.

Which is fine, but it doesn't mean that its "never okay to hit a woman, ever!!!".

You're not the only one, bro. People tend to get all out-of-sorts when child-rape (not paedophilia) comes up. It's best to keep a level head, but some people don't have that kind of discipline.

@ikspreekvlaams
Yes it is, just start walking, moron.

That's kind of the idea anyway. The picture is just from the perspective of a guy working to get through it, it's likely not meant to imply he's being pushy.

But you're wrong about the semantics. A teenager is still defined as a child. That's really all I'm getting at.

Lol, "random claim". All I said was that I disagree that she was obviously uncomfortable, and I thought her response was overblown, both of which you actually seem to agree with.

@bookhoarder
You just said the opposite of what you said in your previous post. If someone was into you and you were starting to feel uncomfortable would you or would you not simply say "I'm not interested?" In the first post you said she wouldn't, and in the next one you said you would. Please clarify.

Did they ever unglitch the one reason there actually would have been to side with the blades?

In what way do those two things correlate?

He said she hadn't blocked him before he mentioned deleting the account, his meaning is obvious. I also don't see how his actions were "obviously" making her uncomfortable.
Anybody who thinks her rant isn't at least a little over blown needs to reevaluate what they consider an appropriate responses in general.

@norman
That really only applies to being in person. You can't tell if your being ignored for sure on the internet. It's awfully presumptuous to thing that someone would definitely know you weren't interested just by a lack of response.

GochiUsa isn't Ecchi, dude.

Haha. Lol, you guys, "Bethesda says their wyverns are dragons so they're dragons." Keep on dreaming sheeple.

What's wrong with kids watching GochiUsa?

@deadpool007
Teenagers are not more mature than children, because they are children. They are of course generally more mature that children younger than them and less mature than children older than them, because that's how maturing works. Kids don't have some sort of massive jump in maturity on their 13th birthday, it's gradual throughout life. The point at which you become a teenager is arbitrary and that fact is that teenagers are children.
Are you a teenager perhaps? That might explain your inability to accept the definition of a child as many teenagers don't want to thing of themselves as children, though they are.

Look at it. No forelegs. It has the basic structure of a bat. It's clearly a wyvern.

It's clearly a wyvern, bro.

Teenagers are kids by definition, bro. If you're below the age of majority you are a child.

Firstly I'll say that I agree completely with your opinion. Those are the exact steps I would take in that situation.
The problem I have with your first sentence (which I realize by how you phrased it that it's not your opinion) is that by making life as bad as it can possibly be, does that not make it impossible for it to get any worse?

Literally no one important, he makes a fair amount of money playing videos games and posting videos o youtube. He's a complete tool.

How does it not end the possibility of life getting worse?