andrew wakefield

yeah but it wouldn't be the first time a bunch of news outlets reported a story that was bullshit. the font is thinner on the name. the thing is i don't even think the name is that far fetched, most the names that give english speakers a giggle are thai and Vietnamese, i just saw a lady first named titporn the other day, but the font changes and its driving me crazy that no one really see that.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brontosaurus-is-back1/

i think other wasps do that too

eating it faster

it really makes me happy that i am not the only one who latches onto these things

i saw it too had to stare really hard to see plane instead

naturally the person with my opinion has downvotes. is it so awful to care about/for people despite disagreeing with them?

your grams is a sadist

the round ends are heads, and they are each buried into the crotch of the other number.

um, vibrating bullet.

and he was sexuality.

i reread that statement a number of times and no one compared being gay to having downs beyond the part of "a thing that inherently a part of you" in which case its a fair comparison. its clearly just an attempt to find an example that has nothing to do with sexuality as another example of a thing its not ok to prejudge a person on.

lol tyler until i got to the end i was tf those are my exact words. i for one would say that while i get tired of the special names i would strongly distance myself from mr "you have a mental illness" over here. i disagree with elaborate categories, not with specifically who anyone says they are attracted to... i just think "pan" "bi" and other similar "sexualities" are part of one category, whether you wanna say they are all bi, or just give it a different damn encompassing name, its pretty simple either you are sexually attracted to no one, or you are mostly attracted to men, or you are mostly attracted to women, or you are mostly attracted to both. of COURSE there are exceptions in each category with different types of preference but that doesn't mean it needs a new different name it just means you are a unique human like everyone else and have sexual preferences! if we're going to give a special name to everything then i want my unique name for "i like dark men with island accent"

whether you want to argue sex or gender, "science" or social normals, there is very clearly a range of inbetween. at the end of the day, even i might roll my eyes at some of the shit people want to identify as, but who the hell cares what they say they are? like ill agree its annoying when you cant tell for certain a persons gender and they get pissed when you guess wrong (at my job with gender specific screening procedures this is a legit issue i encounter) but who the hell does it hurt to humor them even if you disagree?

lol at "you can have an opinion but you are not allowed to say why"

and im pretty sure the kid his hand is on is Asian. and i think in the 50's we still struggled a bit with thinking Irish people where just regular ol white people and the kid with the bat looks Irish so i would say in this exercise he counts.

thats the whole problem, people are calling sexual preferences sexuality... unless you gunna come up with words for people who like blondes and those who like brunettes and those who like big boobs and those who like little boobs, we need to cut it off and keep it simple... warring over how you want to define yourself this way is silly. calling yourself something general like bisexual does not suddenly mean you are obligated to like everyone regardless of any other preferences you have!