I feel like that's the wrong word. The word that means "assigning human characteristics to things or animals"?

I'm not a fanboi. I just support them for as far as they're holding to the Constitution and trying to help people. But I don't expect someone like you to understand nuance. The self-proclaimed anti-fascist, demanding people comply with government takeover of their very bodies.
When I said I'd be blasting Hendrix while "trading fire with quarantine enforcers", who do you think the camp guards would be? The same people who guarded the camps the last times Democrats wanted to lock up people for no good reason in the US.

Nevermind the doctors being silenced and buried for not towing the party line.
Remember hydrox-whatever? Ivermectin? Or even all the ones who suggested that the jabs (had to change the definitions just to call them vaccines) would lose efficacy or was otherwise less than God's own perfect cure?

A fucking axe!? Should've shot the fucker as soon as he raised it.
And no, happy_frog, nobody who has engaged with your content feels attacked for not being able to use slurs. The actual story is that I was talking about slurs encountered in my educational curriculum, and then recalling slurs used on me. Including from you.
Don't pretend you're not the hypocrite or anything more than common bully.

Hell of a lot more than one percent.
Along with the association AIDS had with gays, blacks, and gay blacks, Fauci put out half baked trash and outright misinformation saying that children who were in the same house as someone with AIDS were susceptible to infection from touching the same surfaces, or even breathing the same air.
I've heard the stories same as everyone else. Gay children being kicked out of the community, people being left to die alone and abandoned for fear that touching them would spread the infection, infected being buried in unmarked graves, often after being victims of violent crime over their status as infected or just for being gay men.
Thanks, Fauci. Did you put that in your movie about yourself?

Says the statist who demands people just fall in line and do as we're told.

Whatever you think my idea of freedom is, it ain't it.

What

No! You're valid and deserve to feel good!

Now I'm gonna replace the fool's gold in your hoard with the crown jewels of a forgotten empire. Take that!

And that's where I think our argument really started. I'm not being led anywhere by people telling me I'm a "free thinker". I already have my own morals and values. I'm only sticking to them. Just like I got on Trump's case for capitulating on gun control, it simply is that I'm on *my* side first and last. And I'll align with like-minded people as far as we are like-minded.
It's gotten me a lot of heat on gun rights forums that I'll call out police and government overreach and missteps, but will still speak out (which is actually dangerous in my neck of the woods) and donate in support of law enforcement.
That is to say, it seems you're implying that I'm being led by the nose. When in fact I know my goals only align with any groups until they don't. But we've agreed for the time on what the more immediate concern is. I'll shoot the anarchists tomorrow, but today stand with them against tyrants.

Oh and I'm kinda reminded of that mess a long time back when some users decided that I was acting white, and that being white is bad.

Thanks for clarifying, guest.
And thanks for gathering receipts, xvarnah.

Well our government's executive is "losing patience" with us and is currently on the bandwagon trying to pressure a private entity into deplatforming a Podcaster for the crime of... getting high and talking to experts for a few hours...
I meant more ToS violations, or deliberately subjective rules for a particular platform. Not as a matter of broadcasting laws.

You overimaginative death lizard!

I much prefer the people who don't treat me like a guinea pig or state resource get rich, long before I will make peace with those who contest my claim of ownership over myself.

My points track. My internal rationalization in the argument around slurs is entirely consistent. Especially given my own racial and cultural background.

And when you see blatant cases of selective enforcement? Such as, everyone knows the rules, but the only big names to ever be punished are those on the "wrong" side?