... Do you guys need a voice of reason?

But you deserve a chance to meet your son!

I'm not sorry!

It is indeed, although calling it an allergy would be incorrect in both chemical and biological terms. And I realized I'm also taking this wayyyy to seriously, sorry mate.

As stated in the beginning of the article, Aquagenic Urticaria is not considered an allergy, as allergies have to have certain reactions within the immune system to be classed as such. There is also the fact that anyone allergic to water simply could not have come to life, since we start our life surrounded by water. Water is all around us, as well as inside of us, and every human being (as well as any other animal on this planet) is based around iron, carbon and water. If the body reacted negatively to such a fundamental part of their cells, they could not really have formed properly in the first place. The body can have negative reactions towards water due to anomalies in the DNA (as in not being tolerable towards certain temperatures or contents mixed within the water (chlorine, salts, etc)), yes, but actual water allergy is not a thing that exists.

D:

Oh sock it

NO WAIT NEVER MIND

I'm sorry but it is biologically impossible to be allergic to water

I wrote to the general a month ago-

How can you be allergic to laxatives

Yes, he's very hot

I am not a maiden in need of defending, I am grown

A month or so

*violin music*
Look around, look around, at how happy we are to be alive right now
Look around, look around...