1543 was the beginning of the scientific revolution when Capurnicus published his book which said the sun was the middle of the universe instead of the earth.
God will never be proven to exist by science because he does not leave physical evidence. At the same time there are stories in the bible that can be proven to have happened using different fields of science. (The story of Noah's ark is currently being tested)
I have heard of at least two that have been confirmed to be possible. I meant to put in the first comment that science can be used to prove the possibility of these happening, not them actually happening. Historians are used for that.
The bible is a collection of books and scrolls written by historians, important people, and random witnesses. Did you think the bible was just a book written by one man? And when I say historians, I mean historians of biblical times, not current day historians.
Yes. Yes. And oh Yes. Unless you know what you are talking about when it comes to God in the bible or you're a prophet. Things like the Crusades, the first 2 were missions to take back the holy city (Jerusalem) in god's name but the last two were just money missions in God's name. The muslim extremist in the middle east use God's name for their own wants. It's pretty sad how people do this. If they believe then they should know that it won't get them anywhere in their walk.
Just because some things that are written in the Bible are true doesn't mean all of them are. There's a 99,8% chance that Jesus actually lived and was crucified, but that doesn't mean he was God's son (or even God himself). Just because the historical aspects of the Bible are true doesn't mean the religious aspects of it are. Learn the difference.
The first two Crusades were missions to TAKE Jerusalem, not to take it back. Egypt held it at the time, and no Christian nation had ever held it before. The Crusades can't have been called upon by God himself, nor can he have wanted it, because it literally says in the Ten Commandments that Thou Shalt Not Kill. One of the reasons was to protect pilgrims, which I think was fine and even expected, but to invade and take the city can simply not have been God's bidding.
It's the same with the letters of redemption and the taxation. Those were just ways for the Church to earn money, and had nothing to do with God or even Christianity.
But to have blue eyes both parents would need to have either two blue alleles or a blue and a green allele, you can't have a dominant blue feature then a recessive brown
Comments