Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
crazycrackle
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
But the question is would you sacrifice your potatoes for this?
25
deleted
· 10 years ago
For the beauty of the rose? Yes.
5
deleted
· 10 years ago
but potatoes are more beautiful
10
saxyguy
· 10 years ago
But the better question is, can you reverse it to get more potatoes
2
deleted
· 10 years ago
Since when did we stop saying money.
5
guest
· 10 years ago
This is an old wives' tale and you've wasted food. Tit.
▼
harmonywho
· 10 years ago
Theoretically, this is a sound idea. A potato is a root with nutrients stored well for plants which is possibly well-accessible for roses in the way indicated. The stems are soaking up nutrients and will soon develop it's own roots. A similar thing works with bushes, why can it not work with roses?
saxyguy
· 10 years ago
Also, roses come from bushes to prove harmonywho's point