Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
kennytt
· 10 years ago
Only if there's another light source that's brighter than the fire
10
guest
· 10 years ago
fire's plasma
▼
blue
· 10 years ago
Fire is not plasma
10
deleted
· 10 years ago
Fire plasma
sireenawolf420
· 10 years ago
It still bugs me..
guest
· 10 years ago
but... but... because fire is a light source, shouldn't there not be a shadow at all?
1
ironman
· 10 years ago
The room is lit by something else, not just the fire.
11
deleted
· 10 years ago
It says It is a source of light not it is the only source of light
6
shadowwraith29
· 10 years ago
EITHER WAY... This is a photoshopped image because the rotation of the shadow does not match the rotation of the hand, and also the knuckles are wrong and the thumb muscle.
▼
guest
· 10 years ago
Also, fire is one of the non-matter substances in the world. It has no mass and no shape. Therefore, it cannot have a shadow.
▼
guest
· 6 years ago
Maybe it's a natrium gas lamp. It would only get reflected by natrium gas or solid objects. Because the flame cannot reflect the natrium light rays you won't see a shadow of the flame.
xshadowxqueenx
· 10 years ago
· FIRST
▼
taeminnieah
· 10 years ago
Yes you do, shadows can't exist without light
5
gunnerwolf
· 10 years ago
Fire can still have a shadow jesus christ i hate tumblr smartasses sometimes.
▼
deleted
· 10 years ago
Fire is wrapped all around the head of the match, whose shadow we can still see on the wall, Jesus Christ get your shit together.
▼
wuxing
· 10 years ago
R-R-R-R-R-REPOST.
▼