The sad thruth is this is on some level true not saying all the time but yes sometime but also like into days world we dont have drafts we send willing people on to the battle field and even most non fighting people of higher rank at one point fought for thier country
Do you truly think that ISIS, Al Qeada, anarchists, and the like aren't worth fighting?
Do you really think that allowing everyone from anywhere to go anyplace else without restrictions wouldn't allow criminals to thrive?
That the ideals of entire civilisations are pointless?
Stop trying to sound enlightened, you obviously don't know anything about why people fight.
Hah, trying to sound enlightened?Is that suppose to make you feel higher than everyone who doesn't share the same view as you? So I can't throw my theory out here? You basically just made the point I was making. You justify fighting those groups because they don't fit exactly into your petty perspective of how the world should be. I have no idea what you mean by criminals. Is it illegal immigrants or murderers. Cilivizations standards and beliefs are basically also made of ideas that the founders think the world should be ran as. The only thing worth killing each other over in this world are food and water. You can't live without those two essential things. And no, I do not support communism and anarchy before you throw another assumptions. I enjoy my fair share of seeing people die for stupid reasons. Now is my theory a fact? No, so do the same thing and stop acting like everything that you type is a damn fact.
Guest, so let me get this straight. Hypothetically; If there is a relatively large group of people out there that share a common belief. And that belief is that everyone who doesn't agree with them should be killed. And this group is acting on their belief by killing non group members. If someone has the power to stop them from killing, should they? Is there any moral obligation to do so? Even though food and water are irrelevant?
Do you think politely asking terrorrists and criminals to stop hurting innocent people would make them stop?
Are you suggesting we arrange a meeting with Putin so that we could politely ask him to stop hurting Ukraine?
"Pretty please, stop lighting little girls on fire for trying to go to school."
"Pretty please, don't forcefully annex an otherwise stable state."
Don't be an idiot.
Just to please famousone and his redneck brothers, shall we just nuke the whole world. Is that what you want? Or maybe you want our good ol' USA to conquer the whole world? Which is it?
Okay, first off, I'm lost. I don't recall voicing an intention to destroy or conquer the world.
Secondly, why didn't you post this in the thread you and I have going on? We all know it's the same guest.
Do you really think that allowing everyone from anywhere to go anyplace else without restrictions wouldn't allow criminals to thrive?
That the ideals of entire civilisations are pointless?
Stop trying to sound enlightened, you obviously don't know anything about why people fight.
At least . What I could decipher didn't.
Are you suggesting we arrange a meeting with Putin so that we could politely ask him to stop hurting Ukraine?
"Pretty please, stop lighting little girls on fire for trying to go to school."
"Pretty please, don't forcefully annex an otherwise stable state."
Don't be an idiot.
Secondly, why didn't you post this in the thread you and I have going on? We all know it's the same guest.
Im glad to God that you dont have an account.
Take your bullshit to YouTube.
Theyll certainly accept you.